The new Spanish Governments representative in catalonia acknowledges that there was a problem youre going to hear of the killing though the law not bundle like but youll go with us you will be saying youll say so the loudest poster for it like you will but she defends the trial itself theyre going to stop by and this by now at least another part of the weatherly the has to go there are certain leave it but up a little harder but at the last of the. Form a Supreme Court judge martine piolin has a very different view. They were. Really abolished so. Many men look at possible elaynes here. Or there. Or see that other corner of the sort of the next holy cause or. At the rally here or there or move. Very thought that i may be on. On the 11th of february 29th in the eve of the trial we travelled with noel. To madrid won a bleak jail outside the spanish capital. All that was meeting her client. The 64 year old speaker of the cut a lady in parliament who it found guilty faces as many as 17 yea
California argue the law only applied to instate sales. The oral argument or two hours. The argument hearst this morning in case 21 for 60, eight National Pork producers versus ross. Mr. Bishop . Mr. Hief justice, may it please the court, the fact we alleged or seem to be true, but this is a decision here. The state clas the process violates the Commerce Clause, because its an extra territorial regulation that conditions pork sales on ouof state farmers, adopting california preferred forming that these. For no valid safety reasons. Proposition 12 also fails tip because it burdens interstate commerce for no local benefit. California to change farming methods everywhere, to quote, prevent animal cruelty by phasing out extreme animal confinement. That confinement occurs in othetes. California imports 99. 9 of pork. Decisions like baldwin establish that even when the lais triggered only by instate sales, the state may not project its legislative into he states in that wa to do so infringes
California argue the law only applied to instate sales. The oral argument or two hours. The argument hearst this morning in case 21 for 60, eight National Pork producers versus ross. Mr. Bishop . Mr. Hief justice, may it please the court, the fact we alleged or seem to be true, but this is a decision here. The state clas the process violates the Commerce Clause, because its an extra territorial regulation that conditions pork sales on ouof state farmers, adopting california preferred forming that these. For no valid safety reasons. Proposition 12 also fails tip because it burdens interstate commerce for no local benefit. California to change farming methods everywhere, to quote, prevent animal cruelty by phasing out extreme animal confinement. That confinement occurs in othetes. California imports 99. 9 of pork. Decisions like baldwin establish that even when the lais triggered only by instate sales, the state may not project its legislative into he states in that wa to do so infringes
California argue the law only applied to instate sales. The oral argument or two hours. The argument hearst this morning in case 21 for 60, eight National Pork producers versus ross. Mr. Bishop . Mr. Hief justice, may it please the court, the fact we alleged or seem to be true, but this is a decision here. The state clas the process violates the Commerce Clause, because its an extra territorial regulation that conditions pork sales on ouof state farmers, adopting california preferred forming that these. For no valid safety reasons. Proposition 12 also fails tip because it burdens interstate commerce for no local benefit. California to change farming methods everywhere, to quote, prevent animal cruelty by phasing out extreme animal confinement. That confinement occurs in othetes. California imports 99. 9 of pork. Decisions like baldwin establish that even when the lais triggered only by instate sales, the state may not project its legislative into he states in that wa to do so infringes
California argue the law only applied to instate sales. The oral argument or two hours. The argument hearst this morning in case 21 for 60, eight National Pork producers versus ross. Mr. Bishop . Mr. Hief justice, may it please the court, the fact we alleged or seem to be true, but this is a decision here. The state clas the process violates the Commerce Clause, because its an extra territorial regulation that conditions pork sales on ouof state farmers, adopting california preferred forming that these. For no valid safety reasons. Proposition 12 also fails tip because it burdens interstate commerce for no local benefit. California to change farming methods everywhere, to quote, prevent animal cruelty by phasing out extreme animal confinement. That confinement occurs in othetes. California imports 99. 9 of pork. Decisions like baldwin establish that even when the lais triggered only by instate sales, the state may not project its legislative into he states in that wa to do so infringes