and others many of those folks one by one have disappeared. it s interesting because there have been three national security advisers. the president has to hire a fourth now. that has to be a trick can ki job. colin powell described it as truant officer, fireman, chaplain, psychiatrist and the occasional hit man. so it s a tough job in any administration, but i can t imagine how much more difficult it is to do it when the boss himself, the president, wants to be all those things as well and take away any influence you might have. that s my big concern is whoever comes next hopefully will have somebody will have the access and influence to tee up the right options and help the president make the most context yul decisions going forward. jim, the white house expected during was responsible for a whole bunch of leaks to the news media including his opposition to the president inviting the taliban leadership to camp david. the president apparently did not like it being public
they are in a bad way. if you say to them, if you are able to devote any extra time there will be incentives for that. put it this way, should you be able to fluth k out of welfare? that s hard to do. not under this law. that s more of bill s house. he has no welfare. i do have a wheel house. but have you a lot of wheels. have you 30 seconds. i of on erred to be i offered to be a truant officer to make sure they get to school. but there is a truant officer in front of this truant officer. i blame reagan. which reagan, be specific. just say yes. oh i thought you were going to say reagan from the exorcist. blame her. she is creepy. we are running out of show.
does that require a response? they should put something on the screen that says i won t even say. of course i am kidding about trusting them. the same government that lied to us about landing on the moon would certainly lie about something like this. you will get there eventually. you say it is like a truant officer which is maybe true, but more icky? no, i think everything when it is updated through technology seems icky. but for the most part it is an extension of what we have already had, just a little more convenient and a little more shady. it protects the kids from the teachers. i m telling you this is a veiled exercise in saying, oh he is not in mr. stevens office. i don t understand why they are making them wear these. you can lose a badge. you have to implant that sucker.
does that require a response? they should put something on the screen that says i won t even say. of course i am kidding about trusting them. the same government that lied to us about landing on the moon would certainly lie about something like this. you will get there eventually. you say it is like a truant officer which is maybe true, but more icky? no, i think everything when it is updated through technology seems icky. but for the most part it is an extension of what we have already had, just a little more convenient and a little more shady. it protects the kids from the teachers. i m telling you this is a veiled exercise in saying, oh he is not in mr. stevens office. i don t understand why they are making them wear these. you can lose a badge. you have to implant that sucker.
something like this. you will get there eventually. you say it is like a truant officer which is maybe true, but more icky? no, i think everything when it is updated through technology seems icky. but for the most part it is an extension of what we have already had, just a little more convenient and a little more shady. it protects the kids from the teachers. i m telling you this is a veiled exercise in saying, oh he is not in mr. stevens office. i don t understand why they are making them wear these. you can lose a badge. you have to implant that sucker. i agree completely. oh my goodness. tracking darts. by the way, shear why the judge ruled against the student, the letter the student s father wrote to the