Thouctiontionv that im cosponsoring a measure today along with mayor lee and along with supervisors yee, breed, farrell, chiu, wiener and martha would require a comprehensive facade inspection, maintenance and repair of certain buildings that are five stories or more to reduce the risk of death and or injury that may result from deterioration on exterior facades of buildings. Deteriorating facades can pose significant threats to Pedestrian Safety and this is an issue that was highlighted following the recent earthquake that impacted much of napa. Not only does this measure aim to reduce Pedestrian Safety hazards before following an earthquake, it also serves to reduce post earthquake facade debris blocking First Responders priority access routes. So, with that i hope to get the full support of the board on this measure. And the next two i have two in memoriams. It was incredibly sad last week that actually there were two district 4 residents that unfortunately passed away due to accide
To let the courts handle this matter. But if you look at the complaint which is verified under penalty of perjury by mr. Bradley, youre going to find an exhibit the deed of trust. If you look at the deed of trust that is in your packet, and i can give you the specific exhibit reference in a minute, youre going to find that in the deed of trust it references that this loan is for 637 peralta, not 639 peralta, the adjacent lot. And what happens to mr. Bradley is when indymac goes out of business deutsche banc takes over and that hadxctionv off to a firm in nevada [speaker not understood], they as the deed of trust foreclose and they make a mistake. They foreclose on both lots. Thats why were here today and thats why we filed a lawsuit. They foreclosed on 637 and 639. So, after they foreclosed and made this mistake unbeknowsctionv to mr. Bradley, he had no clue any of this he had no clue any of this went on ~ until an indication in may of this year that there was construction on his prope
~ 118 fremont street. Colleagues, lets first take item 33 so we can sit as a committee of the whole. We have a motion in front of us. Is there a motion whether we ought to sit as a committee of the whole to consider this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. [gavel] on that motion, madam clerk will you call the roll . He supervisor cohen on item 33, cohen aye. Supervisor farrell . Farrell aye. Supervisor kim . Aye. Kim aye. Supervisor mar . Mar aye. Supervisor tang . Tang aye. Supervisor wiener . Wiener aye. Supervisor yee . Yee aye. Supervisor avalos . Avalos aye. Supervisor breed . Breed aye. Supervisor campos . Campos aye. Supervisor chiu . Chiu aye. There are 11 ayes. The motion is approved. [gavel] and with regard to the hearing itself, item 24, lets open up this hearing. Let me first ask supervisor kim if you have any opening comments. Thank you, president chiu. Colleagues, before us today is a modification to the transbay Redevelopment Area plan that would permit the out
With you, supervisor, that youre potentially interested in hearing from both parties as to in writing as to how the board should decide this matter in the context of the subdivision map act and our local subdivision code. So, perhaps if the board continues to december 16th you would request that the parties submit something in writing before that date. Okay, great. So, with that in mind, with the understanding that the parties would submit something in writing to this board, i would move to continue the discussion and move this item to december is not this item to december 16th. So, supervisor campos has made a motion to keep this hearing open to continue this item to december 16th and request that the parties, any briefing materials the party would like to submit, second by supervisor mar. Colleagues, any objection to the motion . Without objection that motion passes. [gavel] ~ lets now go to our second item. Madam clerk, can you call 24 through 26 . [speaker not understood] pending a
Association fees versus those that are paying market rate. What we discovered, though, in that investigation is that via state law we are prohibited from making any local ordinances that would require a subsidized or lower hoa fee. What is also exciting about this negotiation at the end of the day is that our office has been working with the Mayors Office of housing and the Mayors Office to explore tiered inlieu fees. This negotiation absolutely sets a precedent for that type of policy. We know that a waterfront condo should not be paying the same offsite fee that perhaps an 18unit residential building in the excelsior should pay. This sets a policy preference for understanding that we should look at the value of the condos that we are building and when we do offsite fees versus just letting everyone pay the same fee in and of itself. So, again, i want to emphasize that this negotiation will allow us to build 69 more Affordable Housing units, a net increase of 50 new Affordable Housing