Capricious, ash tear or made sense. The Supreme Court in boumedin struck it down saying it was not an adequate substitute for habeas. Thats correct, senator. Your role was to find out a way to engage congress on the Detainee Treatment because it was your view that congress, being involved, would strengthen the president s hand . As a lawyer . Yes. I was not a policymaker but i did advise. As a lawyer. As did many others. There were very other many fine lawyers, too, senator, who advised the administration that Engaging Congress would be a good idea, because we had read our youngstown and our justice jackson. Any lawyer i think who understands this area of the law would suggest the president is stronger when he has congressional support. The Signing Statement. Is it fair to say there was a conflict between the Vice President s office and other parts of the Bush Administration about what the Signing Statement
should say or look like . Thats my recollection, and thats about all i can reca
and there are no bad guys or girls when it comes to challenging presidents. do you agree with that? people have a right to do that. to challenge precedent? yes. every person is allowed to come to court to bring whatever claim they have. that s how our system works. that s how brown versus board of education came about. exactly right. let s talk about roe v. wade. what is the holding of roe v. wade in 30 seconds? the holding of roe versus wade in 30 seconds, senator, is that a woman has a right to an abortion. they developed a trimester scheme in roe that specified when the state interest and when the woman s interest tend to prevail. let me just break it down. the court said that there s a right to privacy, that the government can t interfere with that right in the first trimester. beyond the first trimester, the
and there are no bad guys or girls when it comes to challenging the president, do agree with that question my people have a right to do that? to challenge the president? every person is allowed to come to court to bring whatever they claim they have. that s how the brown versus education came to be. let s talk about roe v. wade. what is the holding of roe v. wade and 30 seconds? [laughter] the holding of roe v. wade in 30 seconds is that a woman has a right to an abortion. it develops a trimester scheme in row that specifies when the state enters and when the women s interests tend to prevail. let me break it down. the court says that there is a right to privacy, the government can t interfere with that right in the first trimester. be on the first trimester, the
litigation, and there nare no bd guys or girls when it comes to challenging precedent, do you agree people have a right to do that. to challenge precedent? yes. every person is allowed to come to court to bring whatever claim they have. that s how our system works. that s how brown versus board of education came about. exactly right. let s talk about roe v. wade. what is the holding of roe v. wade, in 30 seconds? [ laughter ] the holding of roe versus wade in 30 seconds, senator, is that a woman has a right to an abortion. it developed a trimester scheme in roe that specified when the state interests and when the women s interests tend to prevail. okay. so let me just break it down. the court said that there is a right to privacy, that the government can t interfere with that right in the first trimester. beyond the first trimester, the