one. there are meaningful arguments that can be put forward. the defensive advice of counsel, reliance on, it is a legally recognize defense. but it does not fit the facts here. because donald trump was out making these claims and putting these plans in motion before rudy giuliani really brought this secondary team of lawyers and. he was already out ahead of this. you can t rely on the advice of counsel if your counsel or your coconspirators. in a criminal prosecution, that is perhaps one of the reasons we see this inclusion. and ultimately, the defense here simply doesn t work for trump, although in other cases, it is a legitimate one. barb, i ve got less than a minute, sadly. i do want to quickly talk about that upcoming august 28th date. judge tanya tonkin, excuse, me saying you ve got to come to the table with dates for proposed trials. i wrote a piece that i got a little bit raised on, but i just want? people to understand the realities of trial scheduling. what are the realitie