that s not what the government says. let s start with what we witnessed inside the courtroom. what more did we learn from the arraignment? anything else stand out to you? one of the things we learned wasn t trump s arraignment but in the non-arraignment of walt nauta. i fear this could be the first of many delays in this case. both have speedy trial rights, but the speedy trial clock won t begin until the second defendant, walt nauta, is arraigned. and i do worry delay will be the game donald trump plays throughout this, through the filing of motions, discovery, and if he gets a favorable ruling from judge canon even to delay the case beyond the 2024 trial. i m sure jack smith said in his press conference he wants to a speedy trial. it s the public s right as much
punishable for up to 15 years in prison and/or a $7,500 fine. i understand. do you understand you area charged with the death of justin shilling punishable up to 15 years in prison and/or a $7,500 fine and mandatory dna testing? i understand. do you understand you have the right to plead guilty or not guilty to all of those charges? i understand. do you understand you have a right to a trial either by jury or by judge and at that trial you would have the opportunity to call the witnesses on your behalf, confront witnesses that have been called against you and/or to remain silent and that you will be proven guilt or not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, do you understand those trial rights? understand. are youa probation or parole for any other offense? no. how are you pleading to count one? not guilty. how are you pleading to count two?
very much. find a cool place. while stripping away their trial rights, today the president tweeted in part this when somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no judges or no court cases, bring them back from where they came. the house is scheduled to vote early this week on a so-called compromise immigration bill. there are reports that republican lawmakers are preparing a narrower bill that would allow kids to stay in facility with their parents more than 20 days. that s part of the flores judgment we have talked about the last week or so i want to read this trump wee in full i m gov to have you weigh in. that s not saying anything that s slightly legal, but let s go. we cannot allow all these
2007 to be aware of the mental illness. whatever is causing the community college to stonewall, they should stop it because you take the already important questions of why did it happen? and how it could have been prevented. and you go to the next question, what are they hiding? shepard: does that make sense, david? guest: no, it is federal law that is causing the stonewall. there is no question. this request has to be denied because it violates the right of privative the man and it does. and that includes grade or transcripts but discipline issues, as well, and the college cannot release this information if it jeopardizes the interests of the state. now, what that could mean is trial rights if the information is disseminated in the media that could prejudice his right to a fair trial, information that would not be admitted in trial by a judge, that could cause a change of venue and cause damage to the prosecution in this case and, also, if it