sadness. and there is a deep sense of sadness- and there is a deep sense of sadness. . ., . and there is a deep sense of sadness. ~ ., . ~ sadness. we don t feel much like christmas and sadness. we don t feel much like christmas and not sadness. we don t feel much like christmas and not much - sadness. we don t feel much like christmas and not much like - christmas and not much like christmas and not much like christmas tree or anything but lights because we want the kids not to miss this feeling and life goes on and so, we ll have a small celebration. pm on and so, we ll have a small celebration. celebration. an artist tells us shellina celebration. an artist tells us shelling has celebration. an artist tells us shelling has destroyed - celebration. an artist tells us shelling has destroyed heri celebration. an artist tells us - shelling has destroyed her family shelling has destroyed herfamily home and since this christmas will be a painful one. i home and since this chr
managers in that bill because we don t know the arena we are in. frankly i don t care what the republicans say, our founders when they wrote the constitution, they suspected that there could be a rogue president. i don t think they suggested we never broke president and a rogue leader in the sun at the same time. if you thought it was going to get smoother after a vote, it has not. fox news senior capitol hill producer chad pergram life on capitol hill. today might be more tense than instantly because of this issue about if they send a trial it would actually start. in 1998 clement they spent sent the articles of impeachment to the senate with a separate resolution just a few minutes later. at nancy pelosi s press conference this morning, all reporters including yours truly, wanted to ask about in the speaker was defensive. i said this is ed. any other questions on any other
fair than he normally could otherwise because of mitt romney or susan collins. exactly. he needs 51 votes to decide upon the rules governing the process and we have at least two or three moderate republicans who are interested in actually having a trial it would seem. so he needs them to come on board with the process. let me read to you something from larry tribe. he s citing schumer s proposal to mcconnell and tribe argues that if mcconnell rejects these reasonable ground rules and insists on a nontrial, the house should consider treating that as a breach of the senate s oath and withholding the articles until the senate reconsiders. explain the strategy behind that because wouldn t it be a welcome thing for mitch mcconnell if democrats say we re going to withhold these articles? well, i think tribe s notion here and a few others have put this out there is that if the senate isn t going to take this process seriously, you kind of
today having said that though this story isn t playing as big here in ukraine as it probably is in the rest of europe because as you ll remember since the tragedy of july 24th seen thousands of people have died in this conflict with the dying still continues up to the last week so in a way for ukraine this is just part of a much bigger story that continues to dominate life here whereas of say for most of the rest of europe this is a reason to remember to go back to this conflict which shows no sign of ending well it barbara it to go to you i mean this is of course playing very very big in the netherlands a date and time has been set for court proceedings by dutch officials i just wonder i mean how likely is it that the suspects will actually ever spend a day in court. it is extremely unlikely as far as the 3 russians are concerned the more or less impossible there will be a trial it will be in a sense is so there won t be in the courtroom but of course legally that is possible there wi
the idea that donald trump ordered michael cohen to make illegal payments to women that were a violation of dam pain financial law. now, the issue with that law unlike many laws, to convict somebody of it you have to prove criminal intent. sometimes ignorance of a law is no defense. in this case it actually is. it s not so simple of linking trump to the payment. but michael cohen is clearly saying he had criminal intent. he knew this was about protecting donald trump for the election. and he would testify at a trial it would seem that was donald trump s intent. and when this first came out donald trump lied about it. he said he didn t know anything about the payments. and the other big piece of news which you alluded to was the level of cooperation that michael cohen is providing on the heart of the investigation, which is russia collusion. and it s not completely spelled