When they get their original permit to proceed with construction or demolition or whoever you look at it, that should be the green light to go ahead and you cants like i say, hold any of that against the actual start. And so, i encourage you guys all to please support the appeal tonight and thanks for your time. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker. My name is evan clutter, and i lived in San Francisco for the better part of 40 years. And i am a home owner. And i am familiar with the specifics of this case. And i recently did work on my home and i had a girl come into our family. And made space for her. And this is a really scary for me. And if the permits that i sought and i paid for were revoked and that would have a devastating effect to me. And i am afraid for the precedent that this case might set. It is clear from hearing what happened tonight, a mistake was made by the city. And the permit holders and the owners should not bear me liability for that reason. And i support the appea
Someones tenantcy and so we believe that this gentleman rents a residential house in the procidio where he lives with his wife and family so this was not being used as a living unit in any event. The important point is that the documents upon which this change in the characterization of the building are relied upon are not conclusive, making the changes an abuse of discretion, both the change to the 3 r report by the department of building inspection which is based on the certificate of the final completing from 1970, and the subsequent request for revocation, is based on that characteristic and that change in the characterization from the 3 r department. And this is not conclusive. And no one has seen the permits that this work was based upon and no one has provided an explanation of why this cfc did not result in a change to the 3 r report or the characterization back in the 70s. And it is over 40 years and it is very hard to speculate and to get any conclusion on that today. And in
They have rebuild this property and now you are saying that you have to unbuild this property. The department of building inspection given the zoning clearance we will issue the permit and the issue of the permit is the administratival act based on the information that we believe is correct and accurate as our property records and if someone made an error, in the information, we would take in the appropriate steps to correct that. And in this case, everybody relied on the information that was provided at the time. And our, Records Management division made a decision to revise a three r based on the certificate of final completing. And in the other cases there are no certificates and there are no inspection records. And there are documents related to occupancy and use, that demonstrate the use of a building. And from those documents, we have changed the particular use. Where did this cof material come from . It was my understanding that it was submitted by one of the previous tenants in
Chart stars The Sherlocks are sill Living For The Moment - celebrating the tenth anniversary of their debut release with their biggest ever Yorkshire homecoming show.
KTA Announces April UH Hilo Superstars kwxx.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from kwxx.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.