done anything worse. i certainly would do something different. paula jones is a loser but she may be responsible for bringing down a president indirectly. that statement was a bad statement to have been made. and it s proven to be false. . which statement was that? i m sorry? the paula jones in the deposition, which really started this. when he denied it. if you re in a hole, stop digging. at some point you walk away from the deal. i m not dealing here anymore. i m going to drop his line. i think his little speech after it was a disaster. it wasn t in the right tone, and i m not sure he should have done it. i m not sure he shouldn t have just taken the fifth amount and said look, i don t get along with this man, starr. he is a republican. he s this, he is that and just taking the fifth amendment. it s a terrible thing for the president to take the fifth amendment, but he probably should have done it. i don t think he could have done any worse than what s happened. it s such an
bully. on sunday rod immediately responded to the president s tweet by giving him a little bit. saying we re going to do that investigation that you wanted to do. again, rod rosenstein has got to know better than that. we started out together as public corruption prosecutors. you just don t get that kind of guidance from the president. that s not how the rule of law works. now we see even if he was trying to kind of tread water to make the president feel okay, it s not working because yesterday the president refused to answer the question about whether he had confidence in his own deputy attorney general. his own appointee. maybe he s laying the ground work to get rid of mr. rosenstein, get rid of mr. sessions. we really need rod rosenstein to do the right thing to uphold the values of the rule of law in our democratic process. it s not going to work if he
you can shut down the whole thing tomorrow and everyone will be fine. that comment as progressives rail against silicon valley and billionaires in general. bill gates, warren buffett, jeff bezos. these are people that sort of tread water over our on our side of the political fence. what we need to do with the democratic party, neither party is going to be there for the working people. shannon: leslie marshall, larry o connor, and associate opinion editor. elizabeth herring harrington. on the issue of michael moore. my understanding is that part of the deal were senators elizabeth
you can shut down the whole thing tomorrow and everyone will be fine. that comment as progressives rail against silicon valley and billionaires in general. bill gates, warren buffett, jeff bezos. these are people that sort of tread water over our on our side of the political fence. what we need to do with the democratic party, neither party is going to be there for the working people. shannon: leslie marshall, larry o connor, and associate opinion editor. elizabeth herring harrington. on the issue of michael moore. my understanding is that part of the deal were senators elizabeth
it, about what he thinks his mind-set. he says, they thought we included with russia, but we couldn t even collude with our local offices, meaning? inside the white house, it was so disorganized, that they couldn t have orchestrated a collusion if they wanted to. if that quote is accurate, i mean, jared seems to be telling the truth there. yes or inside the campaign. i think that this is a comment that you ve seen anonymously from a lot of people and from a lot of people, a lot of trump surrogates that the campaign was so chaotic, they were barely, you know, could barely tread water, and how could they have pulled off some complicated collusion scheme with russia? i mean, i think at the very least, we know from the email to don jr. that we now know the