want to hear. bottom line, most important part of this case is did trayvon martin go for the gun? his injuries are not significant enough to claim that he was in fear of his life because he was being beaten. that weapon is going to be a major issue. i don t think he covered that clearly enough. remember, the state of florida, the prosecutor has the burden to prove it was unreasonable self-defense on the part of george zimmerman. didn t have the excuse. i ll count every steve s point. i agree as the injuries as they played out may not have been deadly, but one a good lawyer can get up and say, well, wait a minute, if he didn t kill him, he could have mashed his today ten more times and killed him. doug, steve, thanks. up next, how did the jury dramatic from testimony from a medical examiners and trayvon s testimony.
want to hear. bottom line, most important part of this case is did trayvon martin go for the gun? his injuries are not significant enough to claim that he was in fear of his life because he was being beaten. that weapon is going to be a major issue. i don t think he covered that clearly enough. remember, the state of florida, the prosecutor has the burden to prove it was unreasonable self-defense on the part of george zimmerman. didn t have the excuse. i ll count every steve s point. i agree as the injuries as they played out may not have been deadly, but one a good lawyer can get up and say, well, wait a minute, if he didn t kill him, he could have mashed his today ten more times and killed him. doug, steve, thanks. up next, how did the jury dramatic from testimony from a medical examiners and trayvon s testimony. and the police investigation
want to hear. bottom line, most important part of this case is did trayvon martin go for the gun? his injuries are not significant enough to claim that he was in fear of his life because he was being beaten. that weapon is going to be a major issue. i don t think he covered that clearly enough. remember, the state of florida, the prosecutor has the burden to prove it was unreasonable self-defense on the part of george zimmerman. didn t have the excuse. i ll count every steve s point. i agree as the injuries as they played out may not have been deadly, but one a good lawyer can get up and say, well, wait a minute, if he didn t kill him, he could have mashed his today ten more times and killed him. doug, steve, thanks. up next, how did the jury dramatic from testimony from a medical examiners and trayvon s testimony. and the police investigation
there is a contradiction here. i tend to go forward with amy s conclusion because the bullet had a penetrate two layers of clothing before it hit the body. i think she s probably closer to the truth. the that good or bad for the prosecution in this case? it doesn t make a lot of difference. it points to the fact there s a struggle as opposed to a distance shot which wouldn t go along with george zimmerman s hypothesis. he acknowledges he did fire that bullet into trayvon martin s heart. indeed. there s no question about that. the question is was it part of a struggle? did trayvon martin go for the gun? there s no dna evidence on the gun from trayvon martin. you really can t draw a conclusion. we really haven t heard