the supreme court never weighed in on a feud between presidents, have they? in the post watergate cases, this has come up. they said you do a balancing of the interests here. if the current president isser ats thaasserts, that matters mo than what the former president said. no matter what this judge rules, will this get to the supreme court and the supreme court might want to weigh in. there has never been a case where a current incumbent president says no, or says something opposite to what the former president says. the supreme court is going to weigh in on that, though, john, they have to act quickly. otherwise they have until november 12th. once the genie is out of the bottle, it is too late for the former president. as someone who deals with the national archives, these are these papers are the property of the american people. they re not owned privately by the president and consistently what we re seeing is this trump playbook of trying to delay and
any of it. the mayor of new york city is one of the most prominent officials in america, we re in a tough moment of history, whether it is terrorism or political violence, the nypd said to me it is crucial to have coverage at all times. they never said we have to pay for coverage in certain situations. so i put an appeal that said can we get this rule straight and clear because historically it always has been the first question is how to protect a public servant and their family. we re going to find out what happens there. i ll follow the law, whatever the final decision is. there is no question that a public servant and the family in this case, the question is it appropriate at times. a security detail went with your son to do common errands. the security team and i listened to the nypd, they set the rules, they said whenever we can cover him, we want to cover him. he was very prominent himself, very well known. they said we need to protect the whole family. whenever the younger p
here. the thing to note is the timing is critical as you point out. as of right now, the national archives is set to produce these documents without a court order. so if a court is going to act, they need to act quickly. watch for the judge that this case is in front of, judge tonya, a district court judge in d.c. and she does not play around. she ll move quickly. she ll ask the parties to come in right away, hold a hearing, ask for briefs from the justice department and trump s lawyers and she could rule before november 12th. we may see action on this pretty quickly. we got precedent with regard to not the insurrection, but the nixon tapes, questions of presidential privilege after being in office. this judge is significant. she s tough on the insurrectionists. this is a delay tactic by donald trump. there are precedents for ex-presidents not having executive privilege if the current president doesn t support it, which the biden administration doesn t, and
this, so black people can heal, black people are not going to heal with this stuff keep going on. we the ones that need to be in fear. we re not killing y all. marcus arbery sr., we re going to be tracking this case very carefully and we appreciate you and, ben, we appreciate you as well coming on this morning. thank you, both. thank you. we do have some breaking news here that new york city is announcing it will mandate vaccines for all city workers. this includes police officers. we ll the city s mayor joins us live with the breaking news. and a fox news anchor speaks out after his covid diagnosis. why he s striking a different tone from some of his colleagues when it comes to vaccines. i don t just play someone brainy on tv - i m an actual neuroscientist. and i love the science behind neuriva plus. unlike ordinary memory supplements, neuriva plus fuels six key indidicators of brain performan.
be? well, again, brianna, i think the video is the most important witness here. so you can look at that text messages, and you see the racial overtones in their mentality. i still believe the video you think about this is almost ten years after trayvon martin where another young black man was killed by a citizen and had racial implications. but there was no video in trayvon martin s case, and ahmaud arbery there is a video that everybody can see with their own eyes what took place and we believe that is why we re going to get justice for ahmaud ar arbery. marcus, there is a video in this case, and there is also a national reckoning on race. how much do you think society has changed since the trayvon martin case? not much.