A i can give a little bit of background for this project in particular. When we started the environmental phase of the geary project, the estimate to complete the phase of work was for about 6 Million Dollars. But we didnt request all that those funds at once. We requested installments as we did the work and as it became khroerer what remaining work needed to be done. So weve cock come back to the plans committee and the full board periodically throughout this phase as weve made more progress and clarified what, again, more work needs to be done. The total phase of this work where were estimating now at 6. 7 Million Dollars, which is within near 10 percent of the original cost, but again, we are requesting this work in installments. Requesting it in installments. Hello. I do want to clarify because this is an authority led contract and geary is one of the bigger ones and cash is pretty tight. We purposely asked for the money in installments to help cash flow it, but i think the positiv
Out for ways we can compress the schedule. And i appreciate there is some thinking on this. Is there a written analysis or have you form alized what youre trying to do to make sure youre standing to your schedule . We can provide a written process. Right now were trying to build off the momentum from the mexico city brt trip. Were working with your offices and trying to meet with mta and director risk and this is a conversation about how can we support the city, how to Work Together to make this faster and i think as soon as we nail that down well be happy to document that and hold us all accountable. Thank you. Im personally, on behalf of my constituents and very concerns add thbt what i think is most frustrating to many of us is there are often project schedules and they slip and its difficult for for me to find what those original project schedulings were. There doesnt seem to be any accountability for Holding Project teams to those schedules. Im not pointing i thinkers at the ta in
Funds for the San Francisco transportation prongs is this list theyre the currently ones were working on, you know, bart yeah. We have been coordinating with the Mayors Office but looking at the priorities in corporate k and then looking at what are named as recreational projects for sfmta support. Im wondering if muni is it on the list. So far as i know were seeking state other local levels i havent heard about federal level yet. Inch got no further questions. Thank you for your time okay. Thank you. Good morning happy to be here. Have you had a chance to review the matrix a number of measures are going to be dropped for the matrix to get out of their house of original thats the reason for the delevitations. We have a b on page 8 of the matrix recommending the post position another attempt by a will you ever to freeze the program this is actually a separate item. Oh, im sorry. Im going to take comments for item 5. Open this up for Public Comment on item 5. Okay seeing no any Public Co
Supervisor chiu and seconded by supervisor tang without objection this motion passes. Thank you. Madam clerk other items item 89 this is introduce item. Thank you are there any new items to be introduced . Seeing none. Lets take any Public Comment on item 89. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Thank you very much. Madam clerk anything else else general comment. Come up to the podium share youre ready thoughts you have 2 minutes. Good morning. Im jackie saks i want to speak on what you approved. Item 3 the item on the agenda today went through with approval. I want to let you know regarding the gary project ive been involved with the gary project since january of 1986. I think the people that are involved in item 3 should take a look at the final report of gary Transit Task Force that i served on between 86 and 87 before putting prop b on the ballot in 89 that or i suggested you have those people look at the final report that was published in 1995. I know those are all documents but
Seeking consensus thank you. Y0rd cap and trade with respect to those measures as well as seeking new state funding for Affordable Housing this is new on our Elective Program but something its increasingly important and we want to make sure we have support between Affordable Housing and transportation. Finally, well be getting support for bicycle programs and for number one infrastructure like education that are rising to the top to help protect bicyclists and pedestrians. At the federal level it will be for the transportation bill it expires on october 1st, well be continuing to work with the Mayors Office and the other stakeholders to advance the priorities in that area. With that, if you have any questions, ill be happy to answer them about the legislative program and mark will talk about the things happening at the state level a little bit a question about the new federal transportation funding. I understand part of the program is the advocate for federal funds for the San Francisc