During the past it is very beneficial to have a large number of Board Members really putting the spotlight because project delivery is effective at the staff level and those are things we need to advocate but to have the clear board accountability is something weve looking forward before you decide to speak we have comments as well commissioner weaning. Thank you. Has been noted im commissioner and commissioner chu has raised some concerns at the finance committee. Im a huge supporter of bart and i hope, of course, b r ts going forward. Its a key parted of the future in improving our Transit System id like to have a wider transit of buses but b r t should be quicker way to deliver Rapid Service and to be converted into the future. Weve seen this that instead of being what it should be a less expensive and quicker way of delivering service were seeing unending process and more and more money being put into the market analysis. And this is money to go into the environmental process as op
Well. Were definitely looking out for ways we can compress the schedule. And i appreciate there is some thinking on this. Is there a written analysis or have you form alized what youre trying to do to make sure youre standing to your schedule . We can provide a written process. Right now were trying to build off the momentum from the mexico city brt trip. Were working with your offices and trying to meet with mta and director risk and this is a conversation about how can we support the city, how to Work Together to make this faster and i think as soon as we nail that down well be happy to document that and hold us all accountable. Thank you. Im personally, on behalf of my constituents and very concerns add thbt what i think is most frustrating to many of us is there are often project schedules and they slip and its difficult for for me to find what those original project schedulings were. There doesnt seem to be any accountability for Holding Project teams to those schedules. Im not po
Gary area. Looking at oiflg a locally identified alternative in the document there are a couple of options that we think have the potential of becoming the alternative. And their depektd here. It would include the option to provide a filed at fillmore in order to reconnect the community that maybe as much of a land use and Community Issue as a transportation issue by those optioned will allow this to be done. Side lynn b r t would be provided and the center lane b r t to 22 avenue and a consolidated bus service further to the west. Other maples of accelerating deliver including looking at number one traditionally means of delivering the project. Maria mentioned the designed risk and weve done that on the vanessa project we we can the same thing can be done on gary. Were confident we know what the alternative is and thats the time to begin van the work. Were looking at the non traditional means of construction. The Construction Management guaranteed management these are variations of co
Why should we be confident this is real. Thats a question to staff. Through the chair thats an excellent quo. Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets be clear this isnt about the mta this is a boarder issue why should i trust the process in general. This is not a hit or criticism directed at the city staff if you feel compelled to stand up. But back to this particular project we also at that time, point have had the ability to absorb some of the lessons and we have some understanding of the rapid bus transit so we you shouldnt have to have the same discussions oh, again. Another part that will go towards the credibility this is not a Rocket Scientist case. We can start to get some of the improvements only the ground and that will build more conversations we can deliver and tim can speak to i know there was a presentation speaking to the Mayors Office that theyre under talking to deliver the larger and Small Projects and a director for the strategic planning. I think supervi
My question is this is a nice power point presentation why should we and i guess it states were going to trim two years off the delivery why should we have confidence this is going to actually happen he in terms of that shorter deliver process. Given the challenges that mta has had and in delivering the projects in a time effective way why should we be confident this is real. Thats a question to staff. Through the chair thats an excellent quo. Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets be clear this isnt about the mta this is a boarder issue why should i trust the process in general. This is not a hit or criticism directed at the city staff if you feel compelled to stand up. But back to this particular project we also at that time, point have had the ability to absorb some of the lessons and we have some understanding of the rapid bus transit so we you shouldnt have to have the same discussions oh, again. Another part that will go towards the credibility this is not a Rocket S