the costs went up 75% after inflation. more people didn t go because they had to go to work. a lot of job training programs were cut back. we need a system of automatic, immediate training. georgia has the best system i ve seen. the wealth fair commissioner of georgia michael thurman takes people while they are drawing unemployment, says, okay here s this employer, he needs this. you don t have this skill, i ll give him the training money and he can train you while you are still drawing unemployment then you go to work. saves unemployment, gets them off quicker and the most effective way. these are the things we ought to talk about. where are the jobs coming from? how are we going to get the financing? how are we going to train the people? those are the issues in terms of getting the economy back for real people. greta: mr. president, nice to sigh, sir. thank you. greta: donald frump gets a
farm. regarding the earmarks, i believe that it is this right place to build projects within the state. and, the states have to build roads and bridges. and i don t apologize for building roads and bridges. chris: you are pro earmark. no, during my first term in congress, i signed a pledge that i will take no more earmarks and i have been faithful to the pledge. chris: in terms of the money and i don t know details nearly as well as you do about the clinic, run by your husband, if you say money is going to employees, that would i mean, if he runs the clinic that would seem to be benefiting you guys. actually and, your partner in a farm, federal subsidies would benefit the farm. actually, it did not and took away from the clinic, these were training hours where employees were not able to bring more income in, this is a one-time training money that came in from the fal government and certainly didn t help our clinic, it was something that was additional training to help emp
about $161,000 in government aid to bachmann & associates, government funding. it does raise some questions about some of that are bound to raise questions about some of the bachmann s assertions about cutting back government programs. michael, listening to what she told chris wallace about that money going to the clinic. this was a one-time training money that came in from the federal government. it certainly didn t help our clinic. it was something that was additional training to help employees. can you fact check that for us? yes, i did. first she s referring to that grant i spoke about before. i talked to the state department of human services today about the idea that the money went directly to the employees, not to the clinic. they said, not true. how the clinic used the money, they couldn t say, but as far as they were concerned, the money went to the clinic. the point is she was talking about that as a one-time payment
gone after federal and government excuse me, state government money over the years. both personally and professionally, and let s put that up on the screen. a counseling clinic run by your husband, got almost $30,000 in state and federal funds and a farm in which you are a partner, got $260,000 in federal subsidies and over the years you sought more than $60 million in state earmarks, and more than $3.7 million in federal earmarks. question: that is a fiscal hawk? well, let s go through them, first of all, the money that went to the clinic was actually training money for employees. the clinic did not get the money and my husband and i did not get the money, either. that is mental health training money that went to the employees. number 2, regarding the farm, the farm is my father-in-law s farm. it s not my husband and my farm, it is my father-in-law s farm and my husband and i have never gotten a penny of money from the