records act. we all know what the open records act is. that means it s information that is open. we did not access and find her photo and then stop her. we already knew who she was. we ve received a tip giving us her name. it s a small town, 2000 people. we knew she was. drivers record information, driver suspension, dui convictions, those are public records. just like, and you want your insurance agent to be able to confirm you don t have 100 traffic tickets, because if you do they ll cancel your insurance. same thing here. reporters can verify information that they receive. that is no identity theft. the chief is just plain wrong. what if it had been a more even-handed search? was the search at all justified and your opinion, if it was not a rage? i understand mr. mike saying the point was this was breaking
records, just like, you want your insurance agent to be able to confirm that you don t have 100 traffic tickets because if you do, they are going to cancel your insurance. same thing here. reporters could verify information that is received. that is not identity theft. the chief is just flat wrong. what if, you know, what if it had been a more even handed search? was the search at all justified in your opinion, if it was not a raid. i understand mr. myers saying the point, this was like bringing a swat team for a jaywalking offense. you are saying that nothing wrong was done whatsoever that would have warranted any kind of activity from the police. is that right? you are right, ayman. nothing was done wrong, first. second of all, even if there had been this jaywalking violation, there s a process in the law for that. it s called issuing a subpoena. you may have you ve seen the report that in