Good afternoon. Im andre senior. Im gasia mikaelian. We begin with breaking news in the east bay as firefighters are at the scene of a fire in hayward. Skyfox flew overhead just minutes ago. You could see at one point there were roaring flames coming from the structure fire happening in a neighborhood at cypress and jackson streets. We understand when firefighters arrived, there was thick black smoke and flames already leaping up into trees, which appear to be between a row of homes. There we can see firefighters even what appear to be residents, likely good samaritans, trying to do their very best to protect their homes. We see them taking buckets of water, trying to protect their property. At this point, no reports of any injuries, but this was for a time a massive fire. We know it was at least a one alarm. Were working to get more information on that, but nowhere just yet on how the fire started. Keep this in mind if you are still smelling smoke in the area of hayward. Straight now
Did not limit a respondents ability to engage in expression or debate on any subject he wishes. Because section 52 as disparagement provision places restrictions on certain areas, it does not violate the First Amendment. I cooperate of a Government Program . It has historically been more tied to First Amendment values. To the incentivizing of Free Expression. Factat seems to ignore the that we have a culture in which logos, rockrched, bands, expressing a point of view. Using the market to express views. Disparagements would not work with copyrights. As a powerful Government Program. Let me say two or three things about that. There is no question that through their music, the slants views onssing their issues. Theyre are able to get intellectual Property Protection that way. If they were prevented from having copyright protection or registration on their music, that would pose much more substantial First Amendment issues. Im surprised that you could not bring yourself to say that the go
Prohibit the registration of any mark that may disparage persons and institutions, police or National Symbols. Based on that provision the pto denied response application to register the slants as a Service Marker has been to the pto is willing to not limit responsibility to use the mark in commerce or otherwise to engage in expression or debate on any subject he wishes. Because section 22 a is the experiment provision places a reasonable limit on access to a Government Program rather than a restriction on speech it does not violate the First Amendment. The copyright is Government Program . With a copywriting copyright education is a Government Program but its historically been much more tied to First Amendment values into the incentivized vision of Free Expression. But that part of me seems to ignore the fact that we have a culture in which we have tshirts and logos and rock bands and so forth that are expressing up interview and theyre using the market to express views. Disparagement
Century, Procter Gamble. We begin tonight with netflix and the earnings story that broke after the closing bell. Millions more people than expected subscribed to the streaming service in the latest quarter. New shows helped attract those new viewers at a time when competition in original content is intensifying. Here are the numbers. For the second quarter, netflix earned 15 cents a share. That was a penny below expectations, but revenue was more than 30 higher than a year ago, beating forecasts at rou roughly 2. 8 bil and the stock took off as you see there. Rising initially in afterhours trading, hitting a new alltime high easily. Julia boorstin has more on netflixs quarter. Reporter netflix continues to grow subscribers faster than expected adding a total of 5. 2 million new subscribers in the second quarter, 2 million more than the company projected. It looks like netflix is going to continue to exceed expectations. Netflix projecting, a stronger than expected 4. 4 million subscrib
Of the administration. He has been a little bit more aggressive, little bit more outspoken in the past and i think thats more his character to be more pointed and to be more pointed i guess. Martha roby has been very stick to the facts and i think im hitting everybody but a mix of folks that are hoping to represent the full crosssection of the house and also there was some controversy and there were some criticism from people like therell issa who is a relatively controversial member of the house says none to be in sparring contest with the administration. There was pushed back from him that he was shut out of we thought would be as committee after he was the former chairman of the oversight committee. So there was an effort clearly made here from the republican side while certainly aggressive and active not overly partisan and not overly controversial. Host lets look at the democrats. Four of the five democratic members are also Ranking Members of other committees and clearly the demo