Consider this to be the jewel of the bart system, then you have to actually have some information on the bart system. I think we should include under criteria a, as well. Thing here. Thank you. I wholeheartedly agree. When i first moved to the bay area, more than 30 years ago, i got on bart and was told to get off at the glen park bart station. It is the pleasure of fabulous architecture. You suddenly have experienced a building and you really experience that one. It is a stunning building. It is so worthy. I agree with what the prior two commissioners have said and i do wonder, at this jewel, this stunning piece of architecture is going 47 years without significant alteration and 47 years without any cleaning. [laughter] i would like to make a motion to approve adopt the resolution to adopt the approval. I seconded. Thank you. If theres nothing further, theres a motion that has been seconded to adopt a recommendation for approval. On that motion. [roll call] so moved. That passes unan
If you have a lot of causalities two is okay. But the number of people adversely impacted by dedicate it creates an impact of loss of human life its prefer able to use a hire classification of 3, in fact, it was done to the modern art we believe that the classification should be used as 3 not 2 and for that reason if you do use the classification of 3 the capacity of the facility must be higher than contemplated when you use a lower classification so because of the unique classifications of this facility and its location to the pg e building we believe that the new standards of San Francisco require a heightened design. So that moongdz you minimize Property Damage and you undercut the realignscy program that San Francisco has spent a lot of money pursing. We saw to a smaller degree at northridge in 193 and nooud entire neighborhoods became ghost turns down. A perfectly Good Building was red tagged. The entire neighborhood was disputing shut down that diversifying contract is not resili
Because those policies but because of the proximity of those essential pg e workstation located on the cooperate. This has not been well addressed in the opposing papers. This pg e facility is the principal source of electrical power for the downtown San Francisco business district. Theres no back up. This is pg e recommendation when they were working on an upgrade. To the submittals they estimated if that facility goes down there will be 150 million lost in San Francisco. My clients ray a half a block away would lose power and not be operational. It turns out in the cpc filing if this facility goes down activist its called the embarcadero station the loss from San Francisco will be 3. 5 billion. We have an important facility located next to the property highrise. We believe under the circumstances in addition to the new Policies Incorporated in your general plan the proximity to the pg e facility requires is a different occupancy clarification welcome back be used such as used was mod
Able to use a hire classification of 3, in fact, it was done to the modern art we believe that the classification should be used as 3 not 2 and for that reason if you do use the classification of 3 the capacity of the facility must be higher than contemplated when you use a lower classification so because of the unique classifications of this facility and its location to the pg e building we believe that the new standards of San Francisco require a heightened design. So that moongdz you minimize Property Damage and you undercut the realignscy program that San Francisco has spent a lot of money pursing. We saw to a smaller degree at northridge in 193 and nooud entire neighborhoods became ghost turns down. A perfectly Good Building was red tagged. The entire neighborhood was disputing shut down that diversifying contract is not resilient in San Francisco. Not only are we trying to make sure that 9 resident can return to their property after an earthquake to make sure that the entire neig