nbc news poll finds voters do not want him to run again g dem. we ve including half of democrats. tr again. there s no we ve made a lot of progress and we have to keep it going. voters don t want to see former president trump run again. there s no crime. i got indicted for no crime. and yet, he has huge support within the gop even after his arrest and he s the clear front-runner is america ready for a biden-trump sequel biden-trump sequel. i ll talk to chris sununu who is considering his o i ll talk to new hampshire s chris sue knew new who is considering his own precedential run in 2024. plus, trigger. for this man to sit on his porch and fire at a car with no threat is just angers me so badly. the wrong driveway, the wrong doorbell and the wrong car, simple mistakes that all ended in americans being shot. mr. yarl is fighting for his life. in a nation of guns and growing distrust what will it mean knocking on a stranger s door safe again. and ethic
questions that are raised. it is the same standard being used across the board. code of conduct, ethics laws and why the supreme court, these nine justices believe they are exempt by the basic standards of disclosure, i cannot explain, and i think chief justice should appear before our committee and explaining in or explain the changes that he s going to make. why not invite justice thomas i think i know what would happen to that invitation. it would be ignored. it is far better from my point of view to have a chief justice there. listen, this is john roberts court. we are dealing with the situation where history will remember it as such. i was there when he went through his confirmation hearing and he is an articulate well-schooled man when presenting his point of view, and i m sure he ll do well before the committee but history is going to judge the roberts court by his decision as to reform, and i think this is an invitation on may 2nd for him to present it to
after reports revealing justice clarence thomas failed to disclose real estate transactions from a wealthy republican donor, senate democrats call on the chief justice to testify they have to do something. why does the highest court in the land have the lowest ethical standards? i ll talk to the senate committee chairman dick durbin joining me for insight and bade. washington post columnist eugene analyses are rachael bade, the washington post columnist eugene robinson, amy walter of the cook political report, and marc short former choof of staff to vice president mike pence welcome to sunday. it s meet the press. from nbc news in washington, the longest-running show in television history this is meet the press with chuck todd good sunday morning. americans are seething at their political leaders and at each
have you have you do you believe he has turned your invitation down? some of us are debating whether that response is an official decline of your invite i don t view that as an official response, and we re waiting for the chief justice to answer my invitation i think that s the first step that ought to be taken with th supreme court itself, with its leader, the chief justice. make it clear that they re going to bring reform when it comes to the ethics to the court and spell out what they re going to do i asked the chief justice ten years ago the very question we re asking today, what is the court going to do to bring its standards of ethics up to the level of even other courts in this country i want to talk about the specifics of justice thomas here and ask you this question. the sale of thomas mother s house and the adjacent lots without disclosure on the annual
my mind the supreme court has skpemted itself from the le executive and legislative branches from that and other judges that s a tough the supreme court would have to decide whether a law congress passed would apply to justices, pass that test of separation of powers that s a tough test to pass. what would legislation look like that would enforce an ethical code of conduct on justices? well, the code of conduct would look an awful lot like the code that applies to the rest of government and other judges and basically would have disclosures, timely disclosures of disclosures, timely disclosures of tractions like this, purchase of the justice s mother s home there would be standards for recusal so if there s going to be conflict before the court and the recusal, it be explained publicly and investigations of