mike baker, mister baker, good to see you this morning as i want to read a partial fbi statement on the memo saying, quote, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo s accuracy. in light of these comments by the fbi should this memo be made public? we are in strange territory. normally i would air on the side of caution and on the side of the fbi. a lot of former, current agents have a great deal of respect for them, although men and women on the streets but this is a bigger issue. they have to release this memo and the reason is, this will sound simplistic or touchy-feely but they have an optics problem now. it speaks to the credibility of the bureau. at this stage of the game they
diana was touchy-feely. and it s not just actions, but diana s words that are different. a speech might turn up, she would send the one from the organization with her little post-it note attached saying, i wonder what your views are. and she wrote a bit old friend, james helps diana craft new, more personal speeches. it s april 1991. hiv does not make people dangerous to know. so, you can shake their hands and give them a hug. heaven knows they need it. this was a being reproduced verbatim on the front page of to two broad sheets. it was a big moment. princess diana, the advocate, is an instant star.
prison too. some the most wonderful people in the world. they don t need help. they don t need the government stepping in with their big size and gary is totally, totally right, charlie is right [laughter] kennedy: adam, let me ask you this, you are touchy feely and squishy. shouldn t landlords be forced to take the drapes of society and put them in housing next to families and young children? nobody wants on the excon living near them. they have been rehabilitated under the law and so where do you draw the line. where do you expect these people to live? where are you going to put them? you want to have government programs to have them. kennedy: phil gates bill
end of the day, there s not such a thing as a no-go zone. the reality is the authorities can get in there and do. the question is more of sourcing and trust. what i mean by that is you have decent human intel sources in the communities. you have the level of communication that you re able to build up so if something does happen or someone starts to turn towards the dark side, that mother or brother or indivial will pick up the phone and call the authorities. they can continue to it is hard to build up a level of communication. operation i m not saying this because i want to be touchy feely, from an operational perspective, that s what you need. in the u.s., the fbi and other authorities spend a great deal of time trying to build relations and trust within the muslim community. in part because you need the ability, you need to pick up the phone and the only way you
diplomatic kind of touchy-feely, if you will, that people who were familiar with from secretary kerry or secretary clinton. he was an engineer by trade, so it is a much more methodical kind of looking at the facts before him and making studied decisions, where i think everybody is looking for him to dive in right away. he wants to bone up on the issues. he wants to form those relationships before you see anything very dramatic. and certainly he s not very comfortable, it is obvious, with the public diplomacy aspects of this job. the u.s. secretary of state is one of the most important people of the world. and that, a lot, is through the kind of bully pulpit, if you will, use ugg the press aing th those public appearances. secretary tillerson intends to have a much smaller, lower profile and that s what we ve seen from him on the road. he is having some press