dossier and hypothetically presented that maybe there wouldn t have been a warrant if there had been no dossier. whatever the politics that led to this release, our job is to fact check it. what does this have to do with information from a biassed source? it turns out, judges don t toss information even if it s found to be biassed. one appeals court ruled that the focus is whether the info is from a credible source, and if the source had a credible motive. so if the legal by the warrant could still be lawful. now republicans only released their staffers opinions not the evidence, so we don t know if the material even was biassed or if it was the only thing the court was using the dossier. the fisa application relies