Means that we cannot say that effective measures anymore the conflict is ruled out. What events should be said, lets go to sleep. The conflict is ruled out and it will not continue. In my opinion, it is impossible to say 100 categorically that this case is ruled out, because there are many factors in the creation of this conflict, so there is a need for a solution. The whole matter needs to be addressed by these factors. There is a need for a dialogue and a solution to the issues. In fact , there is a need for the dialogue to continue and for the dialogue to be the second issue. It should be noted that we do not negotiate any agreement on time can you be successful, which is specific to both sides, i am not saying 100 satisfaction, at least in a geometrical way, and otherwise you cannot agree and good luck, mr. Hakim , besides all this, i would like to leave one more point, that at all, the role of actors and powers the transregion of the region in the continuation of this tension or t
The two thousand and one two thousand and three authorization of the use of military force for iraq against al qaeda which is still being used by the United States to justify its presence in military conflicts all of the so when this is a justification for endless wars thinking they say that they have the authorization you just move the goalpost as it were and say this is what covers it ok i suppose it will fly to yemen in somalia and only those who are getting it is ok so i mean you know it. Its already a justification and it doesnt matter the circumstances that was done once and it applies the entire region to how this never get to that obama is the person that ramped up the u. S. Presence in syria and so the justification was to fight al qaeda then obama comes and he supports an alqaeda isis springs up out of out of al qaeda and now trumpet his generals and i want to say trump i would say the generals are going to show their you know. You know where im going there now using it as an
Some real news im joined by my guest mark sloboda hes an International Affairs and security analyst we also have alex chris so far hes the director and writer for the duran dot com and we have Dmitri Bobbitt shes a political analyst with Sputnik International rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it mark lets first go to this authorization for the use of military force the pentagon says. It doesnt need any kind of authorization because the authorization that the u. S. Government gave to the military to intervene in iraq still holds though isis didnt exist in two thousand and three. Under International Law this is just a blatant violation there is no there is no United Nations Security Council resolution the country involved syria has not requested for help and on top of it you you have. A military presence in a country where you possibly could go into a military coup. With another mate a nato country turkey and of course its a face down wit
Exist in two thousand and three. Under International Law this is just a blatant there is no there is no United Nations Security Council resolution the country involved syria has not requested for help and on top of that you you have. A military presence in a country where you possibly could go into a military conflict with another mate a nato country turkey and of course its a face down with russia is this authorization issue hortons or not of course its important first of all there of course there is no u. N. Security council authorization for the u. S. To be in syria there is there in defiance of the syrian u. N. Recognized Syrian Government that wants them to leave that there is obvious there partitioning the country but what has the u. S. Ever cared about International Law so that doesnt even appear in the u. S. Media if you never hear about it right but we get to the issue that is also still barely covered which is. Is the u. S. Legality of the war in syria of the war on syria and
Is over seven hundred billion dollars and its better than does not include war it doesnt go to and id like to point out to our viewers here is that there was in a regional budget and then there was an increase that increase is much is what russia spends on defense in here because every year to russia spends between sixty and seventy billion in its best years which is satellites and saudi arabia we have serious which is twenty seven percent of all what nato is european l. Y. Spend on their defense my use of it u. S. So russia which spends four times less than the european allies on they dont defense is so dangerous its moving its troops inside its own borders its created and you would have to of war in europe thats the object that we get from the newspapers not only in the United States about those you dont see too many russian warships in the great lakes do you mean. There but they go they do go to the black sea no their books signed the baltic sea right next to St Petersburg i think a