different parts of the country. one of the witnesses suggested the idea for a national center of excellence in the data and i. t. systems. we learned that there were fraudsters, con man, who were stealing peoples social security numbers, engaging in identity theft and then able to repeat their success getting either unemployment insurance or ppp loans in multiple states because there s no coordination among the states in trying to crack down on the fraud. so we could invest in doing that. we could extend the statute of limitations for a lot of the criminal fraud that took place. and got crackdown on it because, as you were suggesting before, the government has got to be there to reach out and support the population in the event of a crisis like this. and we ve got to make sure that the government is modernized in wendy to deal with it. i m going to bring briefly pay play devils advocate on behalf of fraud. only slightly tongue-in-cheek. it seemed to me that if choices facing the amer
little money going out the door and people that need it don t get it, or money going out the door in such a fashion that it was fast and equal to the task, but happening in such a way that there is going to be some fraud, that the latter choice was the better one. that is to say, mistakes in that direction we are better and more justifiable. and i worry sometimes that the discourse around this is a justification to not do that the next time around, should we need to. i agree with you completely on that point, but that s not the real choice. i m going to bring briefly pay play devils advocate on behalf of fraud. only slightly tongue-in-cheek. it seemed to me that if choices facing the american government at the time of covid was too little money going out the door and people that need it don t get it, or money going out the door in such a fashion that it was fast and equal to the task, but happening in such a way that there is going to be some fraud, that the latter choice was the b
talking about those poor candies. the shoes that they were wearing or no longer wearing i think you are asking the question, how has mars handled this? i mean, brilliantly. think about this for a moment. when is this happening? just weeks before the super bowl. and suddenly, it s the apple 1984 advertisement all over again. everyone is going to be watching what mars does with their advertisements. the other thing, i think, that mars really understands, really well themself, is that their brand is not chocolate. their brand is joy. and they responded to this sort of tongue-in-cheek, the dear john letter you referred to, some of the queue takeaway lines. they didn t go under them for their specific content on twitter they were not responsive. they did not dive in foolishly and try to make this a serious issue and instead they stuck with their brand. just on that point, and you are a brand expert as well i do wonder in terms of
when is this happening? just weeks before the super bowl. and suddenly it s the apple 1984 advertisement all over again. everyone is going to be watching what mars does with their advertisements. the other thing i think that mars really understands brilliantly so is that their brand isn t chocolate. their brand is joy. and they responded to this sort of tongue-in-cheek, the dear john letter you referred to, some of the cute takeaway lines. they didn t go, other than that specific comment on twitter, they weren t responsive. they didn t dive in foolishly and try to make this a serious issue, and instead they stuck with their brand. on that point, you are a brand expert in marketing as well in these areas. i do wonder in terms of how this is being talked about. i mean, is this something that translates into people rallying around financially in sort of a strategic decision? no. in fact, what s really interesting here is you re
netflix down 50%, the net worth of ftx $32 billion down to 0%. ideology on paper from disclosures and now we see what it does. marc: the war on fossil fuels with oil and gas so what are people using? coal, coal fired xbox and cofiled electric lili: is that cleaner? marc: the steam engines to shovel the coal and fire to get it to go. [laughter] lili: it is too premature. emily: that is the point of wyoming when they put tongue-in-cheek bill and to require oil and gas cars because sick of people like the president telling them what to do in the name up wiping out pipelines and thousands of jobs. more outnumbered in just a minute.