they re still addicted to it. but as long as you ve got the howard behl type characters like glenn beck out there. a lot of republicans are just going to flock to him. however i think peter finch did a better job of playing glenn beck, than glenn beck does. on behalf of the friends of howard behl, i don t go there again. i m going to throw you a curveball because howard fineman has explained this markup of the insurance bill that would result in conceivably in criminal time if you don t buy the mandatory insurance. he said if baucus put it into the chairman s mark up and simply said that this would be handled as lawrence o donnell suggested, it would be handled in terms of the finding of the irs and the irs does attach criminal penalties when you don t pay. so baucus is now saying that was a mistake, are we buying that. i think there s an effort here, sometimes to kill proposals by elevating those penalties as an issue and that is what s going on. there s no question in m
voters who are very vocal and used to be their mainstay, but as our society. a chunk of voters. they re still addicted to it. but as long as you ve got the howard behl type characters like glenn beck out there. a lot of republicans are just going to flock to him. however i think peter finch did a better job of playing glenn beck, than glenn beck does. on behalf of the friends of howard behl, i don t go there again. i m going to throw you a curveball because howard fineman has explained this markup of the insurance bill that would result in conceivably in criminal time if you don t buy the mandatory insurance. he said if baucus put it into the chairman s mark up and simply said that this would be handled as lawrence o donnell suggested, it would be handled in terms of the finding of the irs and the irs does attach criminal penalties when you don t pay. so baucus is now saying that was a mistake, are we buying that. i think there s an effort here, sometimes to kill proposal