attacking personally, the way he acted over the weekend is a step towards firing mueller. do you think the president is laying the groundwork to fire mueller? we see in a series of tweets right now, the statement from the trompe l oeil or suggesting the entire investigation should be shut down. what would happen if the president made that move? sean: joining us now, fox news contributor sara carter, also an investigative reporter. gregg jarrett, judicial watch president tom fit. here we have mccabe fired for lying under oath repeatedly. isn t that what general flynn just got charged with? multiple times, under oath according to the attorney general. that means three different crimes with which he should be indicted and prosecuted. one is false statements, the other is perjury and finally obstruction of justice. he could start with making a false statement, by that reasoning, shouldn t mccabe? sean: make sense, right?
then seven days later he s recused and there s no explanation. sean: let me bring in tom here. as you look at all of this year and you look at the media s reaction and how they can spin the president we now know comey is in trouble, strzok is in trouble, page is in trouble. mccabe is an obvious trouble. i would bet loretta lynch is in trouble. brennan and others in here as well. we have deep state actors that clearly did not want donald trump to get elected or to succeed, and they have been undermining him in ways that i don t think any american could ever have imagined. the anti-trump media and their allies in congress are trying to prop up a mueller operation that is collapsing. you have mccabe and comey, and you can t say one without the other because working closely together, comey was mccabe was comey s protege.
washington, d.c., on capitol hill pushing the dossier together with his partner james clapper. that will come out. sean: thank you all for being with us. so much more to get to. sarah, thank you. tom, thank you all for joining us tonight. devon as is with us. good to see you again, thanks for being with us. let s first get your take on the firings of the deputy fbi director andrew mccabe in the statement of the attorney general. as you know we had the fbi under investigation by our committee for a long time. the fisa abuse and other matters, so it doesn t surprise me that mr. mccabe went. however, our investigation is still ongoing. mr. mccabe still owes us answers no matter where he s working and eventually he s going to have to come forward and provide those answers. sean: one of the things he s going to have to fight the answers, but i really see he even seem to in his statement implicate james comey. did you catch that as well, that
analyst gregg jarrett, tom fit in. joe, it s a lot to absorb, n a t of information, but it is so telling and sad that this could happen in united states. give us your general take away. this is piling on in a very big way. we are headed toward a very sad ending forve the fbi and senior doj officials. mccabe is gone because christopher wray knows what s in the other emails on the other texts. mccabe was sent packing as a result of christopher wray being briefed by a number of people who have access to the investigation that is underway, which is going to lead to criminal charges againstng a number of people. what you are seeing coming out now and the text messages is just the minimum of what is available now to doj officials as they watch it sadly sean: who is going to get charged? i believe that several
out a meticulous case of how the court was misled, deceived, evidence wass concealed, but it may be even worse in those transcripts. leon panetta was wrong when he said, the intel committee didn t even interview the judges. i got news for him, they have ny authority. but they do have authority, as witnessed by this letter, to get their hands on the transcripts of the hearings before those fisa judges. sean: tom, this whole issue of barack obama wanting to be kept abreast of all of this in strzok and page preparing for talking points for obama, wall street journal said it was not about the investigation but earlier comments i saw that you made, you have your doubts about that. you pick. it s either about the emailus investigation or the russian investigation. either way, you see president obama being intensely involved and wanting to know everything about either the clinton email investigation or