So the decision to leave is already having some very immediate impact. First off uncertainty is sweeping europe. The United Kingdom is left divided. The british Prime Minister, David Cameron, has already said he is going to step down and he says that new leadership is needed. The biggest influence is the effect this vote had on markets worldwide. It was a volatile day as stocks just plummeted. And moments ago we did speak with an investor advisor from alamo about the short and long term effects. Richard, what does this mean for investors right now . Investors should remain calm, dont let themselves get emotion fa. They have any money on the sideline that needs to go into stocks, put it in right now. What due predict the future will look like in two years . This issue will have long passed and the market will probably be a lot higher. Reporter the bottom line is that even though this all feels very immediate the transition is going to take awhile. Camerons successor will likely be in pl
Bill dont take my question the wrong way, which of these are edible . Lets go, mets exhibition. Bill the mets are going to the world series. Someone has an idea that everyone in new york should be able to watch the game outside. What do you got . Race relations have deeply impacted new york city. Could the mets and the world series be too old for uniting the Community Back together . Well, he believes it is to show the game in places like government buildings, synagogues, synagogues, you name it. You think they should be on tv. Baseball, back to 1947, color boundary. Bringing players together. We can do it again. Need to create opportunities for people despite background, race, religion, gender. You highfive somebody and then began to take steps to win. Bill we have been missing it for decades. Community policing, all that stuff. Out the window. We just need the mets to get to the world series. Its brilliant. The idea of people coming together to begin to root for the same team and rec
Issue. I commend the epa for working on this rule. Do you have a conference that this final rule is protective of health and the environment, are there gaps in the protections under this rule that would need to be filled by legislation . I believe the rule is very strong and very protective. And in terms of any gaps we dont believe there are any gaps. We believe all the risks are put in place. All the rigorous technical information. What about beneficial reuse . Will this rule restrict beneficial reuse in anyway to stigmatize coal ash . We dont believe it will. The real clarity is not subject to the rule. But still i expect were going to hear from the second panel that legislation is needed to remove epas authority to regulate cole ash under subtitle c in the future. What factors might lead epa to some day regulate coal ash under subtitle c. To be clear we had proposed an approach under d and c. We made a decision under d the seat proposal is no longer on the table. Like any other rule
They wrote that thing, to protect us from that sort of thing. Okay, chris. Chris, i guess one of the issues i would have with your assessment is we have cut the deficits by more than half of what they were when george bush was president. The dow was about 7,000. It exceeded 17,000. The economy was up as i said, over 12 . Corporate profits up over 46 and so the suggestion that these policies were bad for america just frankly doesnt make sense to me. Now, what does is that those policies stopped the collapse of our economy but now weve got to build a foundation for people who have been left behind. For those middle class workers who have been looking at their pay stubs saying i dont see those statistics. And thats why i believe and why democrats believe, the focus has to be the middle class. They deserve a break because my sense is particularly in any district, people say if youre really rich, the government is there for you and if youre really poor, the government will help you but if y
President sarcoys of france. Chancellor merkel of germany and president calderone of mexico. It was initiated by congress but agreed to by all four leaders. So it is out of the ordinary that the speaker would decide that he would be inviting people to a joint session without any bipartisan consultation. And of course, we always our friendship with israel is a very strong one. Prime minister netanyahu has spoken to the joint session two times already. There are concerns about the fact that as i understand it from this morning, this presentation will take place within two weeks of the election in israel. I dont think that is appropriate for any country that the head of state would come here within two weeks of his own election in his own country. The more serious part of your question is about the sanctions. Yes, the president was correct in his presentation on the strength in which he presented his appeal to congress that we not have sanctions at this time. Putting it in perspective, th