the whole thing may now end up in supreme court because the lord chief justice in a very practical today, largely full of journalists justice in a very practical today, largely full ofjournalists but justice in a very practical today, largely full of journalists but a few ofjulian santasupporters than his legal team says there is a point here that needs to be argued over over at what point is there in justice tojulian assange because of actually how late in the day the injustice was the decision was busy from washington. but there is no guarantee will now go to supreme court because they have now got to go to the doors of the supreme court over there in westminster and say knock knock on the letters again. the supreme court could still say no, we re not having it, and at that point is a tradition is back on say there is lots of play for here. it is by no means the end of the day. at that point the extradition is back on. we re hearing thatjulian
said that if he wasn t sent to the united states and that meant that talking about your mental health could become a trump card for anybody who wanted to oppose extradition, regardless of any of the assurances that were made. the united states had argued thatjulian assange is well enough to be extradited. james lewis qc or the american government told the board thatjulian assange mental illness does not even come close to being severe enough to support him being sent to the united states . but lawyers representing julian assange had said that the assurances he had been given were meaningless and were very vague. just a quick recap, then on what had happened tojulian assange. he had been charged in