not through a fair process where both sides get to call, which is always been the case and impeachment. adam schiff is the star chamber. again soviet style like you said. the friends going this is in america when all theam chairman get the call to the witnesses and they don t let the legal counsel and they are using this as an in basement to impeach the president of the united states behind closed tl doors. people get that, we have an election next year. let the people of this country decide, not adam schiff. laura: but it is so obvious tohi me what they are doing andf course they have a complicit media, congressman jordan, and scalise during this mueller thing and i don t know how may times on the show, when the same thing happening in a different form. it wasn t quite so secret but it was a leak and then the new york times had another little thing and then an unnamed source, third-party deal, same thing is happening with new york times story about ukraine about ukraine knew of
rough notes which have been corroborated by several people, by several other people, and other incidental information and other testimony so far to at least open an impeachment inquiry? the answer is a very simple and declarative yes. and one of the things that prosecutors and in this case the house needs to be able to determine is t when is enough sufficient? you don t have to investigate to find all of the wrong doing that possibly exists in this administration. you just need enough tohi make e case t to the american people t support why the extraordinary measure of impeachment may be required here. and i think we re well at that point. in the a letter that i signed wh my colleagues from the watergate office, we laid out at least five things that we were relying on when we reached the conclusion that there was enough evidence of impeachable offenses
will say, we ve seen some really secret stuff, we can t tell you about it, but just trust us, this is really going to be the time that we are going to catch president trump with his hand in the cookie jar. tucker: that s lying, isn t it? well, one person s life is another man s just trying to get to the truth, is what they would always say. look, we are going to see more of it tomorrow. tomorrow we have the director of national intelligence, the acting director coming in tohi testify, 9:00 a.m., everybody s going to be watching, there s going to be hundreds of media people there, every station is going to be covering it live, and look, this is not with the intelligence committee should be doing. if we want to take a whistle-blower seriously, we should be doing it behind closed doors so we actually can talk classifiedla information to tryo determine whether or not there s actual real if there s really something to this complaint or
ends and there s nothing more corrupt than that. of course we suspected that already. more than a year ago comey announced it to the world, in nofact. in april 2018 interview with george stephanopoulos, comey admitted he had the origins of the steele dossier from his boss, the president, watch. did you tell him that the steele dossier have been financed by his political opponents? no. i don t think i even used the term steele dossier, i just talked about additional material. but did he have a right to know that? e that it had been financed by his political opponents? i don t know the answer to that. it wasn t necessary for my goal, which was tohi alert him that we had this information. tucker: it wasn t necessary foruc my goal. of course it would cut against his goal. in that same interview, he suggested the most sensational and least likely parts of the steele dossier might in fact be real. i honestly thought these words never would come out of my mouth, but i don t know wh
achieve, just this week is so important. how significant a role do you think president played in this? he met pink on the g20 on the sidelines. do believe the conversation came up toward north korea? is this one of the reasons the president was encouraged to go to the dmz? the only history, i believe it probably did because china does not want to have north korea collapsed. what will happen, often north koreans will try to be moving in across the border. they don t want to have destabilization over there as well. they know what trump has been trying to achieve. he s been utilizing china at the same time trying tohi get to noh korea as well. it s put america in a stronger position and negotiations with china when many people criticized for the tariffs. when you look at it, this is where the president would go china had more to lose, china