trump and hillary clintoasen, yn potentially because ofto political bias. so unfortunatelypotentiall, we a don t know exactly what the fbis was searching for and we don t know the justification behind the raid as great jarretnd thett it in a piece on fox news .com, quote, the doj redacted trumpdad rade affidavit revealed precious little in earlier today.e in earlier former president trump reacted. soc on truth social writing, quote,l nothing mentioned on nuclear. a total public relations subterfuge by the fbi and doj or our close working relationship regarding document. turnover. we g so the bigav question tonight, where does it all go from here? well, joining us now wit with analysis, the author of the price of principle, harvard law professor alan dershowitz, along with former us attorney brad tolman and fox news legal d analyst greg jared. gentlemen,x ne thank you for joining us . brad , you re former u.s. attorney. i want to start with you will starti cannot get past thet
brad , what s your reaction to what the impartial judge would have taken a look at this thingl and theyooke ask challenging questions and would have said, wait a minute, the controllinggt statute here is presidentialut records act. whs pry aren t you seeking an enforcement proceeding here? to get the documents that you s want? that s what a good message would have done. i think a judge would have to go through this charade in the name of trying to get to know all. hold on . let s let brad respond to this. brad , what s your guess? there s probably if there se probable cause in thisis this affidavit, it s it s in a redacted parts because parts the redacted parts do not have probable cause and it s not sufficient do t for for based o on what we know in order toe kni justify the search warrant. i agree with the professor thatr a search warrant was noth justified in this case, bothe we because we don t have don t have probable cause necessary t the probable necessary to issue it, but als