The existing threestory, three unit wood frame building was constructed in 1878. The certificate of appropriateness is being requested to correct violations to the case management, specifically for work that was completed without the benefit of a parent for beyond the scope of previously approved permits. The entire scope of work is limited to areas at the rear of the property and are not visible from the public rightofway. The enforcement history related to the property was outlined in the case report and stuff conducted multiple site visits to document the work and to ensure the certificate of appropriateness wouldve just completed work and any additional proposed work. The following scopes of work will be legalized as part of their certificate of appropriateness and will abate the opening enforcement case. Remodel and expansion of the existing ground floor unit into unconditioned space, expansion of the existing second floor unit at the northwest corner of the rear, removal, reframi
Theyve submitted a revised project, and the 150e a said in the last hearing, and i think today here again that they agreed with the revised plan, so the president , your motion would be to deny the plan, issue the variance on the condition that it be can he rised to correct the plans and adopt the findings and would that be sufficient to address yes, it does. Okay. So that is the motion, then. On that motion, commissioner lazarus. Aye. President honda. Aye. Commissioner aye. And commissioner swig. No. The next item is item 8, item 7 has been continued. Item 8 is peal number 17151. Cheryl coan with Building Department approval. The property is at 76640th avenue, protesting the issuance on august 18, 2017 to carren bentley and Kristina Svensson of an alteration permit, a rooms down addition to existing residence, no new Square Footage added, all work is within existing building footprint, includes new family room, full bath, hallway, new doors and windows. Neck deck and stair in rear yar
Because the elevator, you know, crosses both property lanes, and physically we issued those because i ended up there during a site visit, and theres been complaints going back and forth here, and then,s ayou know, one side appears to want to keep their half, one side appears to want to demolish their half, so weve got this case of time spent by a lot of dbi inspectors. I went out there about a week ago, and i was actually shocked at the state that this was allowed to get to by two Property Owners. In a storm, this thing could fall out onto the street. So my conscience for the last week has been a better do something about this, because i could be ready about myself on the news some night. People letting this property get like this over a spite or a fight is so spiteful to people like myself that work there at dbi. I dont know why they cant agree on something, but basically, were coming from the safety point of view. Were asked that this get secured immediately, and weve given them the
Today here again that they agreed with the revised plan, so the president , your motion would be to deny the plan, issue the variance on the condition that it be can he rised to correct the plans and adopt the findings and would that be sufficient to address yes, it does. Okay. So that is the motion, then. On that motion, commissioner lazarus. Aye. President honda. Aye. Commissioner aye. And commissioner swig. No. The next item is item 8, item 7 has been continued. Item 8 is peal number 17151. Cheryl coan with Building Department approval. The property is at 76640th avenue, protesting the issuance on august 18, 2017 to carren bentley and Kristina Svensson of an alteration permit, a rooms down addition to existing residence, no new Square Footage added, all work is within existing building footprint, includes new family room, full bath, hallway, new doors and windows. Neck deck and stair in rear yard. Im a single mom. I sincerely want to thank this board and particularly the city of San
Oh can i ask the Vice President to consider the draft finding that are attached . We do need to make the five findings, and the appellant has submitted those for us, and also revised plans that reflect the za project. I thought the Zoning Administrator supported this project . The za initially denied a different project. Theyve submitted a revised project, and the 150e a said in the last hearing, and i think today here again that they agreed with the revised plan, so the president , your motion would be to deny the plan, issue the variance on the condition that it be can he rised to correct the plans and adopt the findings and would that be sufficient to address yes, it does. Okay. So that is the motion, then. On that motion, commissioner lazarus. Aye. President honda. Aye. Commissioner aye. And commissioner swig. No. The next item is item 8, item 7 has been continued. Item 8 is peal number 17151. Cheryl coan with Building Department approval. The property is at 76640th avenue, protest