0 with a little box that says contribute here. tonight, my exclusive interview with doctor anthony fauci. then. you want to be on the side of dr. king, or george wallace? do you want to be on the side of john lewis, or bill connor? this is the moment to decide. senator cory booker on the presidents rousing call to protect democracy. an academy award winning filmmaker doctor don t look up. you know how many meetings we ve had over the last few years. so boring. when all in, starts right now. good evening from new york, i m chris hayes. during this pandemic, doctor anthony fauci has become a fixation. even obsession on the right, and it is among those who see him as a punching bag. for the pointy headed public officials who want to tell you how to live your life. even gone so far as to compare him to a dictator and a murderer. after two years of nonstop murder morphed into a version of vinita mussolini. this is what people say to me, he doesn t represent science to them
month that the rioters that day were called to washington, d.c., by an elected official prompted to walk to the capitol by an elected official, those who created the conditions that led to their conduct have in no meaningful measure been held accountable. he appears to be referring to former president trump. do you believe merrick garland s letting trump off the hook? i am concerned about certain things in particular, frankly, and this is not january 6 related specifically at least to the violence of that day but i am concerned that there does not appear to be an investigation unless it s being done very qui quietly by the justice department, demanding he find 11,780 votes that don t exist, the precise number he would need to overturn joe biden s victory in that state. i think, dana, if you or i were
hearings again soon to bring the public along with us and show what we re learning in real time. we re going to make these decisions very soon. i want to ask you something about a federal judge said who is overseeing some of the january 6th cases. some of the january 6 cases he he said in a court hearing this month that the rioters that day were called to washington, d.c., by an elected official prompted to walk to the capitol by an elected official, those who created the conditions that led to their conduct have in no meaningful measure been held accountable. he appears to be referring to former president trump. do you believe merrick garland s justice department is letting trump off the hook? well, i am concerned about certain things. in particular, frankly and this isn t january 6th related specifically, at least the violence of that day, but i am concerned that there does not appear to be an investigation
know about this group that roger stone had aligned himself with and that was aligning itself with, as they called him, big daddy. some of these domestic extremists were referring to the president as, you know, daddy has called us to washington. time to saddle up. and i m sure, in some sad, sick way, the state will pay for whatever therapy it takes to unpack that. i m going to leave it alone. donna edwards, we have so much of what went on that went on in public view. so, what the subpoenas add is an and i have used this, i m going to use it one more time. the second volume of the mueller report, the obstruction report, it was really in all those footnotes where you learned that what the mueller investigators did was investigated their witnesses and those interviews were made up the narrative of that second volume on obstruction, but it was clear that they were also laying over donald trump s tweets and the
president s knowledge of what was going on. you know, it s sort of, we use this phrase quite often in news meetings but it sort of strains credulity to think that roger stone, someone who was always trying to help and aid donald trump, chose to be protected by a group that was, in public and private domestic chatter, recommending violence on january 6th, urging its members to come armed to washington, d.c., helping organize and enable the possibility of coming armed to washington, d.c., among its members. it s hard to it strains, again, credulity to think that roger stone, accidentally, coincidentally, chose this group without knowing its goals and then, of course, the committee s view has got to be, it strains credulity that the president at the time, donald trump, did not