palm beach county. i wish new york would have in 2020? found a way to keep him, andrea. it s suburbanites, right? we saw that in 2018, winning we invite everybody to florida but this is one we may have taken a pass on if we had had a de democrats back the house. how are they going to react to a vote. plan that first of all would we ll talk more about that later in the show but i couldn t abolish private health insurance, but also i think the resist asking you since you re mr. florida there. republican ad kind of writes let s talk about the impeachment itself, because if she s moving hearing and the fact that not a from taxing income beyond that single republican went over. to taxing wealth, how is that and you think back to the going to work on a practical watergate hearings and also to level. the clinton impeachment hearings and i think what republicans are going to say, what trump s where 31, i think, democrats voted against bill clinton on campaign, brad parscale, are going to p
the problem with that argument metropolitan areas. and not all suburbs, not all is it is very much cities are alike politically in constitutionally legitimate. and regardless of that argument, this country. and the demarcation line seems the president will very likely become the third president impeached by the house of representatives. to be whether a metropolitan inevitably, they will arrive at the moment where they have to say, the president may have done area has at least two wrong but it s not impeachable. continental flights. that seems to be an indicator of that will be the closing where democrats are gaining ground over the long term. argument of republicans one way so they re doing really well in or another. the suburbs of dallas and and that is why there is the houston, obviously austin and import on adam schiff and nancy san francisco and new york. pelosi to lean in and make this but the key battlegrounds are case and convince the country that indeed it is impeachable really
context of when he thought it was a connection between aid and investigations, he winced. i don t know what he knows but what i can tell you is i just don t feel like this is quite adding up yet based on the reporting that we have. the reason i say that is because senator johnson had been a real supporter of aid to ukraine. you show the clip of him going on a bipartisan basis with senator murphy. he had supported aid to ukraine. it does look like he has defe defended the president. one question i have is whether or not the president was truthful with senator johnson in their communications about what the motivations were for withholding the aid to ukraine. certainly, why that aid was withheld is a critical issue for the house to unpack. i m not sure we have enough facts to understand which siefds
republican governor there verify the accuracy of those documents to the associated press. usa today reports the clinic is now going to defy a state requirement of two separate pelvic exams on women before having abortions, saying it is not medically indicated and deeply traumatizing and inhumane, they say, for their patients. shannon: there s a lot more to that story we will try to unpack. thank you very much. let s talk about this ninth circuit ruling in favor of the trump administration. planned parenthood calls it an attack on its patients. 2020 democratic contender calls it a violation of human rights. for a reaction, joined by health and human services alex azar. great to have you with us, mr. secretary. essentially what this does, they drove administration reroutes money from clinics that perform abortions or refer for abortions, setting into other clinics. critics say the patients are in danger. i will read more from
fox news has covered and really become just totally donald trump s television. good evening, reverend and thanks for having me. there s a lot of things i would like to unpack, first you started with the manafort sentencing and the president s stating exactly what the judge said. it was a reminder to everyone that this had nothing to do with the russia collusion hoax, and i think it s very important no it had nothing the sentencing on that case had nothing to do with it. the president said that the judge said nor the charges. wait a minute, i ll let you talk then you let me talk. he said that the sentencing had nothing to do he did not say there was no russian collusion. the judge did specifically state that this entire case had nothing to do with collusion or russia. that s what i just said. so it s worth noting and stating because what we ve seen in this manic reaction to the sentencing reform.