$65 million settlement, isn t that enough? one would think, sour grapes, come on just take the 65. in actuality they have a good reason to go become for the appeal, what they think is a good reason, and you ll see it in the clip now. i would say it s three hood winkings. the original happens in 2004 when mark creates the facebook, a competing product when he s in a partnership with us. the second is throughout the entire litigation suppressing off of the smoking good evidence and electronic communications between mark and his other friends at the time, inducing us to settle, and when we didn t have all that information. and then the third of course would be during the mediation, the fact that they represented their securities as one price when they themselves were valuing it at one fourth that price. jon: so, do you remember when