constitution? chris, we ve had we have a long and very distinguished history in the united states of the courts standing up to executive branch officers, including the president, when they act out of line. in the bush administration there was a tremendous amount of litigation against the executive branch under the president s direction relating to guantanamo, to holding on to prisoners. this is just as unconstitution am. there s a direct prohibition on what president trump is do in. and it is true that no court has ever directly ruled on an emoluments case. they haven t had to because no president dared to do anything like this in the history of our country. so if you were if a court were to grant standing, which i would imagine is the first thing they challenge you on and this
let s say some federal district court judge finds in your favorite, what would it mean for an article three judge to say, yes, the predent of the united states is in violation of the conition, mike, what is the remedy? has anyone done that before? has a federal cot declared a president in violation of the constitution? chris, we ve had we have a long and very distinguished history in the united states of the courts standing up to executive branch officers, including the president, when they act out of line. in the bush administration there was a tremendous amount of litigation against the executive branch under the president s direction relating to guantanamo, to holding on to prisoners. this is just as unconstitution am. there s a direct prohibition on what president trump is do in. and it is true that no court has ever directly ruled on an emoluments case. they haven t had to because no president dared to do anything like this in the history of our country. so if you were i