sense, investigation wise, to have cast such a wide dragnet that you would, unavoidably, be one of the people whose records would have been accessed, as well? i mean, it seems far more selective and targeted, which doesn t speak well about a wide scope or dragnet to get to the crux of the issue. does it seem that way to you? well, laura, you re the former-career prosecutor. and you would know, better than me. but clearly, in hindsight, there was no predicate for this. you know, usually, you think subpoenas have to be predicated on some notion of what we would, i guess, as a layperson, characterize as probable cause. clearly, there was none. clearly, it was a dry well that kept coming up. and not that fact notwithstanding, attorney general barr pushed to go ahead on this. i mean, who laura, who does this? russia does this. north korea does this. authoritarian regimes do this. but this doesn t happen in a healthy democracy. and it ought to serve as a very loud-warning sign to all a