is going to turn almost everything that she has in her possession including the home movies from her kids bar mitzvahs over to the legislative committee. here s the next question, right? this question of immunity. and there was some back and forth today about immunity, and one of the things that s a little strange here, or not strange, is that you ve got parallel investigations. this is the legislative investigative committee. it, of course, can t afford her any kind of immunity from any criminal prosecution because that actually isn t in their purview, right? and once again, i ve always believed this legislative committee hearing is really aaa. the show, if you will, is going to be u.s. attorney for new jersey paul fishman s investigation. that is going to be where lives are changed, careers are made and people ultimately go up interstate 84 to danbury. at this point, bridget kelly understands, as does her lawyer, that she is not going to be
committee hearing is really aaa. the show, if you will, is going to be u.s. attorney for new jersey paul fishman s investigation. that is going to be where lives are changed, careers are made and people ultimately go up interstate 84 to danbury. at this point, bridget kelly understands, as does her lawyer, that she is not going to be bargaining with the committee that ultimately can t give her a walk no matter how much she has to say. so there was a back and forth today also about this public/private distinction i thought was fascinating. was basically this. the lawyer for the committee basically saying, we saw evidence of moments in which there was a beginning of an exchange on official e-mails that then went to private channels and we want those, too. what is the precedent there? because that seems like something increasingly common among actors in this sort of technological atmosphere. yeah, and you re right, chris. it s increasingly common, but it doesn t mean that those commun
this question of immunity. and there was some back and forth today about immunity, and one of the things that s a little strange here, or not strange, is that you ve got parallel investigations. this is the legislative investigative committee. it, of course, can t afford her any kind of immunity from any criminal prosecution because that actually isn t in their purview, right? and once again, i ve always believed this legislative committee hearing is really aaa. the show, if you will, is going to be u.s. attorney for new jersey paul fishman s investigation. that is going to be where lives are changed, careers are made and people ultimately go up interstate 84 to danbury. at this point, bridget kelly understands, as does her lawyer, that she is not going to be bargaining with the committee that ultimately can t give her a walk no matter how much she has to say. so there was a back and forth today also about this public/private distinction i
the first amendment, the first amendment. establishes the separation, the fact that the federal government shall not establish any religion and decisional law by the supreme court over many, many decades. the first amendment does? clarifies and enshrines that there s a separation of church and state that our courts and our laws must respect. so you re telling me the separation of church and state is found in the first amendment? so here is the deal 47 past the hour. if you re going to use that argument, it helps to be the lawyer. separation of church and state doesn t appear anywhere in the first amendment. in fact, that phrase wasn t even written until 1803, 1804 when jefferson wrote a letter to danbury, connecticut, baptists. there you go. it s not in any of the founding documents.