behavior of wall street. i don t think that s asking too much. you know it s interesting you brought up social security and medicare. you d like to hear him say he would veto anything that would do that. because his first budget, you must have been let s erase 90% of it. there was one part of it, he said, not touching medicare and social security, which doesn t make some house republicans happy. did that make you relieved? but that s only half the story. okay. see the other half of the story is that paul ryan and his friends, both in the house and the senate, are working to cut social security and medicare. so it s not good enough for him to come up with a budget, which is going to undergo as all president s budgets do massive changes. what s important for him tonight is to say to his republican colleagues, forget about it. don t waste your time. i am going to veto that legislation. and let s go forward and start to take on wall street. by the way, i introduced legislation with
may not be the guy for me. he s promised me a job. and by the way the base strategy of the first month. now look, look bill, tonight, it has been i would say all weekend and including the seniorest most administrative official in the white house. they are really trying to have a positive attitude, optimistic outlook. they have said the words unity a lot. we heard it before the inauguration, i believed it before the inaugural speech, turned out it wasn t as unifying as it could have been. i do think tonight they seem more serious about trying to sound more optimistic. i think that s nice and sounding good is good. but you could save jobs. that s easy. 4.7% unemployment. that s easy to know exactly the people who don t have jobs and canton, ohio, no one can snap his fingers in fairness there are people underemployed. that s a tough problem to deal with. i agree, but one thing you can do is try to make things more bite sized.
credit when he said hey, you can t do repeal without having the replace ready to go. but you also have teamed up with two other senators to say, hey, what we re seeing right now, coming out of the house even is not a full repeal, so you re not interested in any of it. is there any health care plan that isn t going to have some portion of it that could be classified as obamacare? well, we promised the electorate we plan 2010, we took over the house, not for partial repeal. we took over the senate in 2014, we promised complete repeal, we won the white house on the complete repeal, so, the starting and ending point for republicans, and where we have previously been unified is complete repeal. now complete repeal does not include refundable tax credits which are basically the government giving you money back that you did not pay in taxes. that is simply subsidies by another name. it would be a permanent entitlement program, and it sort
that s why i have the spark cash card from capital one. with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on all of my purchasing. and that unlimited 2% cash back from spark means thousands of dollars each year going back into my business. which adds fuel to my bottom line. what s in your wallet?
i never understood how you can do legalization without citizenship. to your point about immigration and needing the off party president to bush it, the fundamental problem with immigration is republicans didn t trust obama to enforce it. i think to be clear, obama figured if i didn t enforcement first, people would come in and negotiate. he took them at their word. what was the biggest republican complaint against obama? what is trump not touching, dreamers. daca. he s already not touching it. what he said and what he willing to put skin in the game