we want to take you right back to the supreme court confirmation hearing for ketanji brown jackson. under title vii, it is generally impermissible. and impermissible only in very narrow circumstances? i believe so. and the statute itself has some restrictions in terms of to whom it applies. right. the employers. some are exclusions in terms of religious employers, for example, not being able to discriminate on the basis of race but it exempts religious employers within certain spheres in order to be able to protect that religious employer s discretion to operate within its faith and the rules of its faith. and by doing that, it makes that much clearer, by making that
Gerald Bostock's former boss accused him of visiting "former boyfriends because he is gay" with work funds in firing him. Now he's asking a court to rule in his favor.
FELDER v. US TENNIS ASSOC Second Circuit Felder’s complaint did not allege USTA exerted control over AJ Security’s hiring process or training him, paychecks Felder’s burden to show employee-employer relationship, contractors need to control employee’s conduct assignments