supreme court, picking people to serve for a lifetime and above politics. dana: give alex a quick last word. go ahead. we looked at this issue when fdr was president, considered one of the only stains on his presidency. it was a bad idea then. it is a bad idea now. congress has authority to do so, you don t need to amend the constitution. it doesn t say how big the supreme court has to be, it is a horrible idea for folks to propose altering democratic institution because of current political dynamic. dana: you guys, chris, you got my heart rate up. thank you. my job. thank you. dana: fox on the front line is here, benjamin hall come necessary contact with isis fighters and he will join us next.
president trump talked about another thing that has come up in the democratic primary about the supreme court. watch this. pres. trump: no, i wouldn t entertain that, the only reason they want to catch up so if they can t catch up through the ballot box by winning an election, they want to try in a different way. we would have no interest in that whatsoever. it will not happen. it won t happen for six years. dana: that is the idea about expanding court packing. chris, what do you think of that? i guess you want to get rid of the supreme court, too? no. i m not for core packing. the merrick garland not being voted on up or down was a trafest and he should be addressed through congress. but i think that look, i m not for packing or changing the foundation of the court. we have to work to make sure the court is politicized and that the confirmation hearings are about the credentials and less about the personality. it is not an election for
might be to president trump in unflattering terms, including this pun-filled one from devin cow account. devin s boots are full of manure, he s utterly worthless and pasture time to move him to prison and one said if you believe in obstruction of justice and perjury, vote for devin nunes, but if congress devin nunes meant this to be a warning shot to anyone criticizing him, it backfired with comments proliferrating today, criticizing him as thin skinned and his lawsuit as frivolous. now some have stuck up for the congressman. one twitter using warning devin cow that dark days are coming to which the twitter cow replied, dude, you re threatening a cow. nunes said twitter did nothing
other calls and frustrations with social media. your thoughts on this as silicon valley looks on, going what is going to happen in d.c.? yeah, and it is not even just the white house, obviously tis congress, as well. the big social media companies are now the black hats that they are facing a lot of scrutiny and i bet there will be an effort to pass legislation that has some regulation and some way, shape or form, of these big social media giants. dana: all right, bret baier, pleasure to have you today, thanks for watching the press conference with us and your analysis. we will see you tonight at 6:00 p.m. thanks, bret. the president just making news on the future of the supreme court. what he said about democratic calls to pack the courts. facebook feeling the heat for how it responded to attempts to upload video of the new zealand terror attack. no amount of people we can
that has no bearing on the iraq war. and being, the iraq war was a war with boots on the ground. no one is talking about boots on the ground here. when you look at the polls, you are looking at coupleulative affect of being in iraq and afghanistan and you do see the weariness that came from those and the president talked about that as well. and i think it is a president who is not anxious to do what he is now arguing he needs to do because of the chemical weapons. we are monitoring as well. the house foreign services committee is on listen to john kery and chuck hagel and dempsey as well. here is a piece. this debate i might add to you is about congress redline. you agreed to the chemical weapons convention. not all were here to vote for it