whether there are specific issues, you talked about a counterintelligence investigation of the current investigation but every little bit of this is bad optically for the president if not legally, he doesn t either. if you are looking at 2020 and running again if they chipped away at him so much with the dribble of people close to him getting in trouble even if he never touched. how do you talked to voters about that? inherently it looks political. what mueller has is russian type stuff. a meeting with russians, potential business deal with russia. i agree with andy, collusion isn t really a legal term but there is no question what the charge was because we heard the charge at the end of the campaign and after the campaign, that donald trump s team worked with vladimir putin s team to rig the election and tip it
threats of new subpoenas and a second special counsel, that is how some congressional republicans are reacting to a new york times report that deputy attorney general rod rosenstein discussed wearing a wire to secretly record conversations with president trump and even discussed invoking the 25th amendment to oust him this led to senator lindsey graham to renew his calls for a special prosecutor to look into the russia probe. it s a bureaucratic coup against president trump being discovered here. before the election, the people in question tried to taint the election, tip it to clinton s favor. after the election, they re trying to undermine the president. i don t know what rosenstein did, but i know what mccabe or
he was out speaking to a group when he got fired. there is no reasoning that if at the present, president wanted to fire rod rosenstein he could not have done it today. there is an effort to push it further out, maybe to exact some statement about his intention with the meuller investigation. there would ve been no reason if you wanted to terminate him that he would ve done that. julie: a lot of his allies have said hold off until making the decision until the kavanaugh hearing is over. it does not look like it will end overnight. and you have senator lindsey graham, basically voicing his concerns and believing that he does not believe that the president should fire rosenstein unless he has absolute proof that rosenstein in fact live. let s listen to him on fox news sunday. there is a bureaucratic coup against president trump that is undiscovered here. before the election, the people an election tried to taint the election and tip it to quentin s favor. after election, they are t
over the weekend allies of president trump threatened to issue new subpoenas demanded a second special counsel and even warned the president of a setup, all in reaction to one new york times report, that deputy attorney general rod rosenstein discussed wearing a wire to secretly record considerations with president trump and discussed invoking the 25th amendment to oust him in the days after fbi director james comey was fired in may of 2017 this led senator lindsey graham to renew his calls for a special prosecutor to look into russia probe and the president s boosters on fox news warned him. there s a bureaucratic coup against president trump being discovered here before the election the people in question tried to taint the election, tip it to clinton s favor, after the election they re trying to undermine the president. i don t know what rosenstein did, but i know what mccabe or
college dropout could just drop out with very little formal training in medicine and, yet, invent something that was really going to revolutionize medicine and blood testing felt immediately far fetched to me. that said, i probably wouldn t have done anything with that hunch if i hadn t gotten a tip a few weeks later. when i got a tip it was from a third-hand source and i sort of pulled on that string for a few weeks and eventually made contact with a crucial employee who had just left and that employee was the former lab director. and he was terrified when i first made contact with him. dana: why? he was being hounded by the company s lawyers. he had sent a bunch of work emails to his personal g mail account to protect himself and the company wanted him to hand over his g mail credentials so they could delete everything. they were threatening him with litigation and so he was shook up. he only would talk to me if i granted him consult think and from there i worked