could find no one, no one with first-hand knowledge. not one person with first-hand knowledge. to support the allegation. but, rather, multiple on the record denials. again. the timsz also reported that the claimant said she, herself, is uncertain of her claim. that s the new york times whose creed dough is all the news that s fit to print. it found this latest last-minute allegation not even fit to print. oh, but that hasn t stopped judiciary committee democrats from shoveling it to their smear campaign and demanding for further delays. they kept this one secret from republicans, too, by the way, evidently several
this either to the federal election commission or on the president s candidate s financial disclosure form where he is supposed to be doing closing everything he has an interest in. so certainly things need to be looked into, but i wouldn t want to pre-judge the facts here. we ve talked about conflict of interest in the context of president trump. if this were to remain in open court, what could we learn potentially? bearing in mind you don t know all the facts, but if we were to see this advance further, what questions would you have that could be answered by this going forward in open court? well, i don t know, there are two sides of this. there is the civil dispute between president trump and stormy daniels. that is one side. but the side i ve been talking about is the potential prosecution for an illegal campaign contribution or for msz
as they call for gun legislation. they say never again. let s listen. there is no bigger disrespect to be sitting in the balcony of the house session with them introducing us and then them turning down their chants to fix what they have done. thsz not fake news. i m not a fake actor. i m not an actor. we will not rest until we have change. way to go, spencer. msz!
steve bannon was not putting out all of those tweets. steve bannon was not directly responsible for the white house that we ve had. i think it is sort of ironic that this week his firing comes after a week that you could describe as peak bannon where the president embraces culture war, and he braces racial identity and grievance. i would say not just embrace it but encourage it and fan the flames of it. absolutely. and applaud it. other presidents have obviously manipulated and exploited racial grievance but what you saw was a very concerted statement when steve bannon talked to the quts new york timsz, take down more of those statues. he likes it. he wants this to be about race the democrats on the left talking about race whereas he s going to talk about economic nationalism. reality is that you ve seen some very significant cracks now in