Maimed so many people, such as Heather Abbott jeff bowman so many others that that terrorist killer who paralyze add Great American city would die for his crimes. Lets get right to cnns deb fashg, fashg feyerick what was the reaction in the courtroom . Reporter start first of all with some of the victims and their relatives, the survivors. Some of them did dab tears as the verdict, as the sentence was read in which Dzhokhar Tsarnaev will receive death for the crimes he committed at the Boston Marathon. The jury they looked straight ahead. They did not look at Dzhokhar Tsarnaev while that sentence was read. Dzhokhar tsarnaev meantime he really looked forward in the court. He didnt look towards the jury though every now and again he seemed to sort of tilt his head looking at them. He was looking mostly at his lawyer because the jury what they did is they broke down the capital counts. So instead of finding that the government had proven beyond a reasonable doubt all the capital counts an
interview to two reporters from the buffalo news who wrote an extensive study about what he had to say about what took place, aened enedand beyond that jake a lot of parallels between the two. both timothy mcveigh and tsarnaev showing absolutely no signs of remorse. that obviously can play on a jury s mind. both of them did not take the stand. both of them had a big beef against the government. mcveigh going back to ruby ridge and what happened at waco. tsarnaev making his feelings known, certainly at the very least by his writings on the side of that boat and as i think deborah, or jeffrey, pointed out, dropping that knapsack with the pressure cooker bomb, choosing to drop that behind martin richard, before that bomb was set off. so a lot of parallels between these two cases, and both juries finding for the death penalty. if you re just joining us we re discussing the fact that a
government since the death penalty was brought back in 1988. what happened with the mcveigh case? what parallels do you see that might be drawn here with the tsarnaev case? reporter: jeff is absolutely right. four years was considered at the time a very short length of time to go through the appeals process in a federal case like this. many thought that appeals process would drag on for years. while four years is a long period of time it s not as long as many thought it would be before finally he was brought to terre haute, indiana for the execution. it s important to remember that in the meantime it is very likely just like timothy mcveigh tsarnaev will be brought to the supermax prison in in colorado to wait out the appeals process. so his conditions will be very restricted during that period of time. and it was actually during that period of time that timothy mcveigh granted a full-out