How to steal a nation (or not)
By
December 23, 2020
How do you eat an elephant? South Africas Anglican Bishop Desmond Tutu once declared, There is only one way to eat an elephant: a bite at a time. Tutus nation was facing the task of ending the long-standing practice of racial segregation. It would appear that radical liberalism has applied the bishops counsel to stealing the United States of America.
Democrats have busy, but on the wrong things. Rather than addressing the best interests of the nation and its people, Democrats subjected the United States to baseless charges of Trump-Russia collusion in the 2016 election, an absurd and unjustified impeachment of the president, and inciting violent anarchy in our city streets, surreptitiously disguised as righteous outrage over the regrettable death of George Floyd. These all failed.
Americas election system is a mess
By
December 18, 2020
It is manifestly true that peaceful people will tolerate increasing levels of crime and corruption until one day they rise up against it. United States citizens are rapidly reaching that point.
The notion defies reason, that a majority of otherwise-intelligent voters would willingly forsake their personal and public interests and elevate to the highest post in the land, a sullied, lack-luster career politician who could not attract followers if he was fleeing from a burning building.
Nevertheless, media pundits wasted no time anointing Joe Biden as president-elect, but saying a thing does not make it so. If anything remains of honor and integrity in America, the November election will be exposed as the most spectacular fraud scheme in U.S. historynot because President Trump prevails, but because truth is vindicated and the Republic remains intact.
Vote fraud: maxim or myth?
By
December 14, 2020
That the people of the United States are deeply divided has become a cliche in our national discourse. Contrary to the claims of some, the singular source of division today is not political but moral. Dishonorable politicians habitually attempt to obscure the stark black-and-white contrasts of morality with the colorful and pliable Play-doh of political preference for their own advantage. Few subjects illustrate this divergence better than voter fraud.
Arguably, the most frustrating and potentially dangerous aspect of radical ultra-liberalism is that truth is less influential than perception. The mantra of the mental pathology might well be, perception is reality. But is it really? To what extent are feelings more valid than facts? Subjectivism quickly falls apart under close examination.