strategy now is because we understand after almost 4 years of donald trump in american political life that you can t shaum the shameless. you can t use moral suasion against this guy because he doesn t have any morals. if you re going to go after him, you best get it. and in this case she knows she gets one shot at all this. if she blows it, they won t get him in the senate, which is a huge factor here. if they don t do the thing correctly in the house, they never get to go after him again. he will romp on this and say i ve been comletely clear. they couldn t impeach me. year done. so she knows she has one shot to mock this work and i think the timing question is let s not
actually authorized it, was involved in that and tried to stop the investigation by offering pardons, you show the american people the precedent with regard to nixon, you show them what the constitution says, then you begin to persuade the majority, the overwhelming majority to support. there is a link, i think, to what neera tanden mentioned, the introduction of sweeping reform legislation, public financing, automatic voter registration, ethics rules. people see this all as a response to the attack on our democracy. again, it s part of building a public case that has a broad consensus about democratic integrity, about fighting corruption. right. that not only makes things go smoother it builds a public argument for a different approach across a bunch of different areas. is there a timing question? part of what s strange here, to what michelle was saying, there s a bunch of stuff already
involved in that and tried to stop the investigation by offering pardons, you show the american people the precedent with regard to nixon, you show them what the constitution says, then you begin to persuade the majority, the overwhelming majority to support. there is a link, i think, to what neera tanden mentioned, the introduction of sweeping reform legislation, public financing, automatic voter registration, ethics rules. people see this all as a response to the attack on our democracy. again, it s part of building a public case that has a broad consensus about democratic integrity, about fighting corruption. right. that not only makes things go smoother it builds a public argument for a different approach across a bunch of different areas. is there a timing question? part of what s strange here, to what michelle was saying, there s a bunch of stuff already out there.
stop the investigation by offering pardons, you show the american people the precedent with regard to nex nixon, you show them what the constitution says, then you begin to persuade the majority, the overwhelming majority to support. there is a link, i think, to what neera tanneden mentioned, the introduction of sweeping reform legislation, public financing, automatic voter registration, ethics rules. people see this all as a response to the attack on our democracy. again, it s part of building a public case that has a broad consensus about democratic integrity, about fighting corruption. right. that not only makes things go smoother it builds a public argument for a different approach across a bunch of different areas. is there a timing question? part of what s strange here, to what michelle was saying, there s a bunch of stuff already out there. put mueller aside. only some of it is out there.
the president sort of the foisted this upon us by putting this individual in for the sole purpose of shutting this investigation down. larry nad ler will come in and head the committee. they re going to invite whitaker to testify. if he accident, they ll subpoena him. we don t know how he ll respond to that. signing the letter, asking that the ethics adviser, whether he s been consulted on this, whether with he s advised whitaker and what they ve said. they ve not had a response yet. does that stuff matter? i mean, you know, a lot of things seem to not matter in this administration because they re not really adhering to the rules. reasonable individuals like myself who work there, we would have to go through these ethics reviews. they will review his background and so on. can i just ask a timing