Cspan shop. Org is the online store. Shop for apparel, books, home to core and assess threes. There is something for every cspan fan. Every purchase helps support our nonprofit organizations. Shop now or anytime at cspanshop. Org. I will republican senator Chuck Grassley seeking an eighth term here he faced his democratic challenger, michael franken, and eight bait hosted by iowa pbs. And a debate hosted by iowa pbs. Explore the views of the two men running to represent iowans in the u. S. Senate for the next six years. Lets meet the candidates. Democrat mike franken is from sioux city. Hes a retired navy admiral, seeking his first elected office. Republican Chuck Grassley, of new hartford, was first elected to the u. S. Senate in 1980. He is seeking in a storm. Welcome to you both an eighth term. Welcome to you both. Reporters joining me in the questioning are aaron murphy and breanne p. Chuck grassley, for years youve honored significant bipartisan support as youve run for reelection
Government and that is just a lesser form and a bigger problem. It would save the state hundreds of millions of dollars. It would not save the state anything. The state is in dire need to keep doctors here and provide quality medical care. We are the lowest state in the nation on medicare reimbursement and the public option will only make the situation worse. We have 30 seconds left. We are the only state to have implemented this. It will have in excess of 50,000 people and it should say 15,000. Other states are not taking actions to save water like we are in nevada. We are doing a lot of things in nevada and we are cutting in. We are out of time and there are so many other topics to cover. I appreciate both of you gentlemen to have this time to have this debate and i appreciate everyone in the studio and watching for the indy fest 2022. Cspans washington journal. Every day we take your calls live on air on the news of the day and well discuss policy issues that impact you. Coming up s
Position finish. [inaudible] the fifth element is reasonableness. Everything you do in acting in selfdefense has to be that of a reasonable and prudent person, and you have to have actually yourself believed it was necessary to act in selfdefense. The five elements, innocence, imminence, proportionality, reasonableness [inaudible] what is stand your ground doing . All stand your ground does is take away one of those elements, the avoidance element. You no longer need to seek an avenue of retreat before you can act in this selfdefense. Whats left in place . Everything else. Innocence, imminence, reasonableness and proportionality are all still in place. Its not some mysterious mechanism the nra pus in plait. Put in place. Stand your ground is exactly the same as the oldfashioned selfdefense except for that one element of avoidance. So if you live in a stand your ground jurisdiction and you act in selfdefense, what do you still need to be able to prove . You were the innocent person, you
For the discussion. Everyone was positive in general about the progress made at nato. And some of the challenges we face externally. But, of course, some of the challenges internal to the alliance were not discussed as much. And i thought, perhaps, bob can put you on the spot a bit and talk about one of those which is in turkey, was a surprise that the turkish government decided to open negotiations with a chinese firm to provide missile capabilities. Could you comment on where you see that going, whats the latest status is and the u. S. Government perspective is on that. Well, the u. S. Government perspective is quite clear and that is our good allies, the turks, should acquire a system thats nato and operable. If that were true before ukraine, i think its true in space given the ukraine. So heres a case where the turkish government had a set of metrics to influence a cooperation, a competition. And somehow nato operatability wasnt on that list. And i have a feeling that even the capa
Up next on book tv the a did in the president ial election of barack obama. There were critical of the Republican Party and its nominee mitt while negligent to do the same with president obama. This is about 45 minutes. Thank you, john and i. Thanks to the Heritage Foundation for inviting me. I apologize ahead of schedule. So why a book about the media by yes . There is a shattering topic. When steve forbes came to me in 2010, he asked me how bad were the media in 2008 and i said 100 for barack obama. I said how is it going to be in 2012 . I said worse and he laughed and said how can that be . The didnt care about john mccain. In 2012 they will not only be 100 percent in the tank for barack obama but to the feet of any republican challenging barack obama. So move forward to the end of the 2012 campaign. And i get a call from an editor at Harper Collins recommended that i do a book about the 2012 elections and suggesting the title collusion the media stole the 2012 elections. I have to