associate the flag with whiteness. americans can associate whatever they want with their country. if i see a flag, i can see freedom, religious liberty, capitalism, whatever i want. and she can see oppression and division. that s her right. but we don t have to separate anything we see in the flag. americans are proud of their country not because of their race. but because their forefathers forged this great nation. what the n times doesn t understand what the new york times doesn t understand is that america is about a shared history. those of us who are citizens. she is trying to separate us by race. but we are trying to unite us by an idea. if the new york times would get to know flag-waving trump
associate the flag with whiteness. americans can associate whatever they want with their country. if i see a flag, i can see freedom, religious liberty, capitalism, whatever i want. and she can see oppression and division. that s her right. but we don t have to separate anything we see in the flag. americans are proud of their country not because of their race. but because their forefathers forged this great nation. what the n times doesn t understand what the new york times doesn t understand is that america is about a shared history. those of us who are citizens. she is trying to separate us by race. but we are trying to unite us by an idea. if the new york times would get to know flag-waving trump
associate the flag with whiteness. americans can associate whatever they want with their country. if i see a flag, i can see freedom, religious liberty, capitalism, whatever i want. and she can see oppression and division. that s her right. but we don t have to separate anything we see in the flag. americans are proud of their country not because of their race. but because their forefathers forged this great nation. what the n times doesn t understand what the new york times doesn t understand is that america is about a shared history. those of us who are citizens. she is trying to separate us by race. but we are trying to unite us by an idea. if the new york times would get to know flag-waving trump
a few months later they refused to accept the conclusion that there is no conspiracy, no collusion, no obstruction, nothing happened, the president was not a russian asset like the media and the democrats hysterically claimed. they are rewriting history before our eyes when it comes to the mueller investigation and rewriting history here when it comes to brett kavanaugh. it is shameful for these democrats that are running for office to use a smear that even the new york times is attempting to backtrack. rob: six of the ten 2020 democrats are supporting impeachment at this point. tom stier making the 7, didn t make the stage. the co-authors on exactly how, critical information on the victim not remembering this, did not make the story. we have her name at times doesn t usually include the name of the victim. in this case they felt it was
because joe biden is ahead in the polls. if he was in fourth nobody would mention his age. or whether he could get through. the bottom line is the front runner is always attacked. joe biden did better handling the attacks in the third debate than in the second or first. number one. and number two, the two other serious contenders, senator warren and sanders are not exactly millennial. 70 and older than biden. what the heck are we talking about? go ahead. what the heck are we talking about? we re talking about somebody who to be fair, governor, at times doesn t appear to be as rhetorically capable as he has been. in years past. biden always had a gaffe problem. when he was 38 he had a gaffe problem. and the american people know