docket for nauta. will it be in front of judge aileen cannon or will she self-recuse? we know what the prosecution is arguing, that donald trump took the papers when he had no right to take the papers, that he kept papers even when he was asked repeatedly to give them back, that he lied about what he had, and that he threatened national security, putting lives at risk and the safety of this nation in jeopardy. what else might jack smith s team have, and why wasn t bedminster a bigger part of the indictment? meanwhile, what is donald trump s team going to argue? we ll lay out what will likely come up in pre-trial motions. you heard one of trump s former lawyers tease him yesterday when he talked about prosecutorial misconduct. what else will they argue? and what or should we say who is donald trump s biggest liability? the legal process is just beginning. and so is arguably the political process, just beginning right now. donald trump is already trying to turn this case into a
in-house, sort of cattle gather of sorts, boris epshteyn, somebody serving as kind of quasi lawyer, at least the reporting out there suggests that he has been sort of one of the blockades and has managed to sort of alienate other lawyers on the team. we have heard this from tim parlatore on the record. he has suggested that has been an issue, and there has been concern or at least questions raised about that s why two of his other attorneys resigned just hours before that indictment. does boris have experience in these sorts of prosecutions? has he defended anybody that has been federally prosecuted before that we know of? not that we have seen. garrett, let s talk about the political side of this. donald trump obviously gave a speech last night. what are you hearing from his team about why they think this might be, politically speaking, good for donald trump? reporter: his team is more confident in their political standing on this issue than they are on the legal standing and