we scroll down. disclosure of prosecution material under section seven of the criminal procedure and investigations act. i have considered your defence statement, dated august nine, 2012. under section seven, i am required to disclose to you any prosecution material which is not previously disclosed and which might reasonably be expected to assist your defence is described in your statement. 0n the basis of the defence statement you have provided, i have not identified any further prosecution material which is disclosable to you in accordance with the cpi a. over the page, it says, your client is charged with false accounting by failing to make entries onto the horizon system regarding the deposit slips found and thus the offence has occurred outside of the system, material relating to the horizon system is therefore not deemed disclosable at this time. was that something that you therefore agreed with? $51 was that something that you therefore agreed with? as i said, therefo
two? it says an audit was undertaken at the branch on thursday the 2nd of february 2012 and conducted by richard cross, field support adviser of the network support field team. mr cross was accompanied by his colleagues rob lion, jane timms, paul hayhurst and tim gordon pounder. it was to verify assets and confirm compliance. we have their five names of individuals. is it your evidence that it s not unusual for a large number of people from the post office to attend individual post offices? for the post office to attend individual post offices? post offices? for an audit, it de-ends post offices? for an audit, it depends on post offices? for an audit, it depends on the post offices? for an audit, it depends on the size - post offices? for an audit, it depends on the size of - post offices? for an audit, it depends on the size of the l post offices? for an audit, it - depends on the size of the branch. does it strike you as unusual to have five people? it does it strike you as unus