Otherwise stated. Super safai i think that supervisor safai i think that item number one is going to be continued. So actually why dont we take item number two, please. Clerk yp two, ordinance of money to require parties to pay a refundable deposit when requesting written findings when the assessment appeals board has established procedures concerning the waiver and renewal of requests for written findings. Unless theres any comments from my colleague here why dont we hear from supervisor peskins and aide lee hel heppner. The proposed legislation before you today is an amendment to chapter 2b of the administrative code with policies and procedures for requesting findings of the assessment appeals board prior to an assessment hearing. As i understand it and this was sort of urged to our office at the request of the assessment appeals board, these amendments codify the policies and the procedures that have been developed by the assessment appeals board with the cooperation of the assesso
Doesnt mean it was substantiated. We evaluate the complaint, the investigation determines if theres a factual basis for the allegations and then if the allegations are true, if the alleged conduct would violate city criteria, policy and procedure or city code does that answer the first part . Substantiated or unsubstantiated are both inside the closed category. And in the quarterly and annual reports it breaks down it breaks out by department. Theres a table in quarterly reports or chart showing which percentage of complaints closed led to Department Taking corrective or preventive action. Or even it shows whether or not the department moves on the recommendation of the whistleblower controller office, somewhat outside your control. But at least you can measure accurately the number of recommendations measured against the overall complaints, you said to the department we have investigation pursuant to the authority, we recommend disciplinary action to whatever department and they can b
Commission president wolfram. President wolfram here. Commission Vice President hyland . Commissioner hyland here. At this time. Members of the public may address the commission on items of the interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. Each member of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. I have no speaker cards. Yes, i do. Please come to the microphone. My name is arnold cohen, and i spoke to you two weeks ago about 3620 buchanan, 2016010079 coa. Last week, i spoke to you about the 1973 city resolution declaring the entire area of block 459, lot three, as historical landmark 58. This area includes 3620, 3646, and 3640 buchanan, and 5890 north point. This time, i want to quote to you several passages from resolution 88. Quote, the resolution and boundaries of the landmarked site, being lot three in assessors block 459, which known as 4640 buchanan, end quote, and again, all the addresses i said,
Item two, 247 17th avenue, conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance indefinitely. Item three, case number 201600585cua, conditional use authorization has been withdrawn. Further, commissioners under your item calendar, for the expansion review, this informational presentation is proposed for continuance indefinitely. I have no other items proposed for continuance. I had one item to speak to item eight for the residential expansion threshhold, but i believe it was to the subject matter rather than the continuance. Ok. So, well open it up for Public Comment on the items being proposed for a continuance. [inaudible]. Go ahead. Sure. Absolutely. Ok. Good afternoon. Heres a map that i was going to give you if we had the hearing today. I had mr. Webster make it. It shows all the r. H. Zones. Green is rh1, yellows the no. Red is the rh2 and yellow is the rh3 and you have the ability as a commission to deal with the numerical criteria. Its in the planning code. It says the Pla
Items proposed for continuance. The first one, conditional use authorization iss ed for continuance to january 18, 2018. Item two, 247 17th avenue, conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance indefinitely. Item three, case number 201600585cua, conditional use authorization has been withdrawn. Further, commissioners under your item calendar, for the expansion review, this informational presentation is proposed for continuance indefinitely. I have no other items proposed for continuance. I had one item to speak to item eight for the residential expansion threshhold, but i believe it was to the subject matter rather than the continuance. Ok. So, well open it up for Public Comment on the items being proposed for a continuance. [inaudible]. Go ahead. Sure. Absolutely. Ok. Good afternoon. Heres a map that i was going to give you if we had the hearing today. I had mr. Webster make it. It shows all the r. H. Zones. Green is rh1, yellows the no. Red is the rh2 and yellow is the rh