presidential shirt you don t buy more. when you dpet your obama shirt, you don t buy more. it is not time for 2012 yet. is this the tea leave we can read. does this have a pro predict tiff value? forsake argument, yes. it did say obama the shirts are being sold at a much higher rate than mccain in 2008. and then obama won in a land slide. i will hear countless commentaries. you know where they end up, south america. we send them abroad. and isn t that the real message this holiday season? you see somebody with an l t-shirt on now. pab, this is the richest irony in the obama america?
presidential shirt you don t buy more. when you dpet your obama shirt, you don t buy more. it is not time for 2012 yet. is this the tea leave we can read. does this have a pro predict tiff value? forsake argument, yes. it did say obama the shirts are being sold at a much higher rate than mccain in 2008. and then obama won in a land slide. i will hear countless commentaries. you know where they end up, south america. we send them abroad. and isn t that the real message this holiday season? you see somebody with an l t-shirt on now. pab, this is the richest irony in the obama america? people can t afford to buy obama shirts.
is it a reach to call barking free speech? a judge ruled against an ohio man seen here who was charged in april with abuse of a police dog for hissing and barking at said k-9 cop. the ruling dismisses ryan stevenson s claim that his mutt mocking was protected under the constitutional right of free speech. the 7th amendment, i believe. wrote the judge, quote, even if there was a commune kay tiff value to the defendant s barking and hissing, it is clear this ordinance is directed toward the prohibited conduct and impairment of first amendment rights is incidental. that makes no sense. the best part of the story is the fact that in the police report he says the dog, if only he knew of an effective way to muzzle man s best friend. wilson.
point to you, sir. is it a reach to call barking free speech? a judge ruled against an ohio man seen here who was charged in april with abuse of a police dog for hissing and barking at said k-9 cop. the ruling dismisses ryan stevenson s claim that his mutt mocking was protected under the constitutional right of free speech. the 7th amendment, i believe. wrote the judge, quote, even if there was a commune kay tiff value to the defendant s barking and hissing, it is clear this ordinance is directed toward the prohibited conduct and impairment of first amendment rights is incidental. that makes no sense. the best part of the story is the fact that in the police report he says the dog, if only he knew of an effective way to muzzle man s best friend.
barking free speech? a judge ruled against an ohio man seen here who was charged in april with abuse of a police dog for hissing and barking at said k-9 cop. the ruling dismisses ryan stevenson s claim that his mutt mocking was protected under the constitutional right of free speech. the 7th amendment, i believe. wrote the judge, quote, even if there was a commune kay tiff value to the defendant s barking and hissing, it is clear this ordinance is directed toward the prohibited conduct and impairment of first amendment rights is incidental. that makes no sense. the best part of the story is the fact that in the police report he says the dog, if only he knew of an effective way to muzzle man s best friend. wilson. wilson.