you look at a race like linda mcmahon. president obama was outspent by huge amounts. you have to have money to get into the game, but money doesn t win the game for you. and i don t even think that money was the problem here. she s just going after a particularly ruthless republican senator who was probably going to win that seat anyway. i was more fascinated by the preempt tiff strike to continue to announce that she was going to run. and already her opponent was fighting against her. is that just the way of the world now, pete? well, i think it s always been the way of the world, mitch mcconnell is a shrewd campaigner. ashley judd s big problem is, oh, she s ashley judd. that was her problem and her advantage. one of the best ways to succeed in politics is to have a name that s recognizable like bush or clinton. but, you know, even i would have a better chance, i m on tv, i m on the radio. but it doesn t make me any more
elite counter terror unit launched their raid in pakistan. here is dennis neil with more on this. reporter: disney actually moved with daring speed in trying to trademark america s newest heros. this is the house of mickey mouse and toy story and cars and they are going to slap that dizzy brand on a team of trained killer who just assassinated the embodiment of evil. the last time an entertainment company tried this it did not work. in 2003 zoneee moved to trademark the assault s official name, shock and awe. after they said it was poor taste sony withdrew the action and called it an exercise of regrettable bad judgment. the key question here is whether this plea eplt tiff strike by disney will ignite a firefight. will we see criticism from the aclu or the clergy or islamic groups, the quakers perhaps.
right to crush you. mike: sort of like, you use a knife, we just a gun, you send us to the hospital. we send you to the morgue. the difference here is president obama and rightly having good treaties with the former soviet union. good and bad parts, but by and large is a good thing. what he s not doing though is make us safer from other threats we talked about, pakistan potentially, pakistan s nuclear weapons falling into bad hands of jihadists. iran getting nuclear weapons and launching that whole region in the nuclear arms race and saudi arabia and egypt and maybe syria and turkey, may feel i need nuclear weapons of my own and the scenario whereby israel looks at iran and says we cannot allow iran to get nuclear weapons because it s the end of our existence and we will have a pre-em tiff strike and we have a regional war. and the thing i worry about the united states has acted as
that now. i don t think iran feels the need to engage in a crash program and what they are doing, i think, systematically and have been doing for some time, is steadily expanding their nuclear infrastructure. building right redundant facilities and making any pr pre-yep tiff strike preemptive strike less likely to happen and it is not what date they can get the bomb but now big the nuclear infrastructure is and it is getting bigger all the time. eric: and the issue you raise, even if there is an attack one day it may not get all of the infrastructure? that is exactly right. and i think the danger is, we may be very close to the point where an attack would put israel or the u.s. or both in the worst of all possible worlds, gaining the opposition for many who oppose such an attack. but, not really accomplishing